Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735860›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Effect of Visual Feedback on the Eye Position Stability of Patients with AMD.

Esther G González, Mark S Mandelcorn, Efrem D Mandelcorn, Luminita Tarita-Nistor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Foveolar Drusen Decrease Fixation Stability in Pre-Symptomatic AMD.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  2. Binocularity Principles of PRL Development in Patients With Macular Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther G GonzálezKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
Mark S MandelcornDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
Efrem D MandelcornDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.
Luminita Tarita-NistorKrembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sources of the reduced fixation stability exhibited by patients with central vision loss in the light are relatively well understood, but we have no information on how they control eye position in complete darkness, in the absence of visual error signals. We therefore explored the effect of visual feedback on eye position stability by testing patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and controls with normal vision in the light and in complete darkness. Nine patients (ages 67 to 92 years) and 16 controls (ages 16 to 74 years) were tested binocularly in the light and in complete darkness while remembering the location of a now invisible target. Binocular eye position was recorded with a video-based eye tracker. Results show that eye position stability both in the light and in the dark is worse for patients than for controls and that, for the two groups, eye position stability in the dark is, on average, 5.9 times worse than in the light. Large instability of fixation in patients with AMD was found even in absolute darkness when the scotoma cannot impair vision. These data reflect permanent changes in the oculomotor reference of patients with AMD.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationcentral vision losseye position stabilityfixation stabilityvisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID31735860
PMCPMC6969921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.