ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019
What Neuroscientific Studies Tell Us about Inhibition of Return.
Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Non-spatial inhibition of return attenuates audiovisual integration owing to modality disparities.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Object-based inhibition of return in three-dimensional space: From simple drawings to real objects.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Spatial attention to social information in poker: A neuropsychological study using the Posner cueing paradigm.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2023Article
- Predictive remapping leaves a behaviorally measurable attentional trace on eye-centered brain maps.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Spatial inhibition of return is impaired in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.PloS one · 2021Article
- Exploring the temporal dynamics of inhibition of return using steady-state visual evoked potentials.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- A 5-min Cognitive Task With Deep Learning Accurately Detects Early Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An inhibitory aftermath of orienting, inhibition of return (IOR), has intrigued scholars since its discovery about 40 years ago. Since then, the phenomenon has been subjected to a wide range of neuroscientific methods and the results of these are reviewed in this paper. These include direct manipulations of brain structures (which occur naturally in brain damage and disease or experimentally as in TMS and lesion studies) and measurements of brain activity (in humans using EEG and fMRI and in animals using single unit recording). A variety of less direct methods (e.g., computational modeling, developmental studies, etc.) have also been used. The findings from this wide range of methods support the critical role of subcortical and cortical oculomotor pathways in the generation and nature of IOR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.