Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735853›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019

The Role of Perspective Taking on Attention: A Review of the Special Issue on the Reflexive Attentional Shift Phenomenon.

Gabriele Pesimena, Christopher J Wilson, Marco Bertamini, Alessandro Soranzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Both the domain-general and the mentalising processes affect visual perspective taking.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriele PesimenaDepartment of Psychology Politics and Sociology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK.
Christopher J WilsonSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-0662
Marco BertaminiDepartment of Psychological Science, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8617-6864
Alessandro SoranzoDepartment of Psychology Politics and Sociology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S10 2BP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is a process that alters how cognitive resources are allocated, and it allows individuals to efficiently process information at the attended location. The presence of visual or auditory cues in the environment can direct the focus of attention toward certain stimuli even if the cued stimuli are not the individual's primary target. Samson et al. demonstrated that seeing another person in the scene (i.e., a person-like cue) caused a delay in responding to target stimuli not visible to that person: "alter-centric intrusion." This phenomenon, they argue, is dependent upon the fact that the cue used resembled a person as opposed to a more generic directional indicator. The characteristics of the cue are the core of the debate of this special issue. Some maintain that the perceptual-directional characteristics of the cue are sufficient to generate the bias while others argue that the cuing is stronger when the cue has social characteristics (relates to what another individual can perceive). The research contained in this issue confirms that human attention is biased by the presence of a directional cue. We discuss and compare the different studies. The pattern that emerges seems to suggest that the social relevance of the cue is necessary in some contexts but not in others, depending on the cognitive demand of the experimental task. One possibility is that the social mechanisms are involved in perspective taking when the task is cognitively demanding, while they may not play a role in automatic attention allocation.

Indexed as

alter-centric intrusiongaze perceptionperspective takingreflexive attentional shifttheory of mindviewpointvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID31735853
PMCPMC6969940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.