Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735847›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Seeing Beyond Salience and Guidance: The Role of Bias and Decision in Visual Search.

Alasdair D F Clarke, Anna Nowakowska, Amelia R Hunt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Visual search habits and the spatial structure of scenes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Search strategies improve with practice, but not with time pressure or financial incentives.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alasdair D F ClarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-2351
Anna NowakowskaSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-4726
Amelia R HuntSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4122-9499

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search is a popular tool for studying a range of questions about perception and attention, thanks to the ease with which the basic paradigm can be controlled and manipulated. While often thought of as a sub-field of vision science, search tasks are significantly more complex than most other perceptual tasks, with strategy and decision playing an essential, but neglected, role. In this review, we briefly describe some of the important theoretical advances about perception and attention that have been gained from studying visual search within the signal detection and guided search frameworks. Under most circumstances, search also involves executing a series of eye movements. We argue that understanding the contribution of biases, routines and strategies to visual search performance over multiple fixations will lead to new insights about these decision-related processes and how they interact with perception and attention. We also highlight the neglected potential for variability, both within and between searchers, to contribute to our understanding of visual search. The exciting challenge will be to account for variations in search performance caused by these numerous factors and their interactions. We conclude the review with some recommendations for ways future research can tackle these challenges to move the field forward.

Indexed as

attentiondecisioneye movementsstrategyvisual search

Identifiers

PMID31735847
PMCPMC6802808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.