ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019
The Changing Landscape: High-Level Influences on Eye Movement Guidance in Scenes.
Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling human social vision with cinematic stimuli: An integrative approach.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Visual attention and subjective preference in mascot design: evidence from eye-tracking, ratings, and fsQCA.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Visual Integration of Semantic and Spatial Information of Objects in Naturalistic Scenes (VISIONS) database: attentional, conceptual, and perceptual norms.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Applying mobile eye tracking to measure real-time engagement and enhance informal learning at environmental exhibits.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The fundamentals of eye tracking part 1: The link between theory and research question.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Foreground bias: Semantic consistency effects modulated when searching across depth.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Revisiting the role of attention in the "weapon focus effect": Do weapons draw gaze away from the perpetrator under naturalistic viewing conditions?Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- How Do Repeated Viewings in Forest Landscapes Influence Young People's Visual Behaviors and Cognitive Evaluations?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Meaning maps detect the removal of local semantic scene content but deep saliency models do not.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- A consensus-based elastic matching algorithm for mapping recall fixations onto encoding fixations in the looking-at-nothing paradigm.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
- Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Meaning maps capture the density of local semantic features in scenes: A reply to Pedziwiatr, Kümmerer, Wallis, Bethge & Teufel (2021).Cognition · 2021Article
- The Foreground Bias: Initial Scene Representations Across the Depth Plane.Psychological science · 2021Article
- A Case for Studying Naturalistic Eye and Head Movements in Virtual Environments.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Gaze Behavior During Navigation and Visual Search of an Open-World Virtual Environment.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Task-Dependent Eye-Movement Patterns in Viewing Art.Journal of eye movement research · 2020Article
- Fixation durations in natural scene viewing are guided by peripheral scene content.Journal of vision · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of eye movements to explore scene processing has exploded over the last decade. Eye movements provide distinct advantages when examining scene processing because they are both fast and spatially measurable. By using eye movements, researchers have investigated many questions about scene processing. Our review will focus on research performed in the last decade examining: (1) attention and eye movements; (2) where you look; (3) influence of task; (4) memory and scene representations; and (5) dynamic scenes and eye movements. Although typically addressed as separate issues, we argue that these distinctions are now holding back research progress. Instead, it is time to examine the intersections of these seemingly separate influences and examine the intersectionality of how these influences interact to more completely understand what eye movements can tell us about scene processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.