ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Temporal Limits of Visual Motion Processing: Psychophysics and Neurophysiology.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based gait classification and genome-wide association identify a QTL for gait type in Colombian paso horses.iScience · 2026Article
- Spatial suppression of motion and motion segmentation in peripheral vision.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Visual motion sensitivity and driving performance and safety.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Critical spatial separation at the scale of V1 receptive fields determines motion segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Area MT carries acceleration information in a quickly and directly decodable representation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Lawful kinematics link eye movements to the limits of high-speed perception.Nature communications · 2025Article
- hMT+ activity predicts the effect of spatial attention on surround suppression.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Article
- An Arduino-Powered Device for the Study of White Perception beyond the Visual Chromatic Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Head position control strategies in progressive Supranuclear Palsy versus Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease during dynamic-on-static platform tilt.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Inferring visual space from ultra-fine extra-retinal knowledge of gaze position.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- On the interplay of temporal resolution power and spatial suppression in their prediction of psychometric intelligence.PloS one · 2022Article
- Form and Function in Information for Visual Perception.i-Perception · 2021Article
- Effects of internal and external velocity on the perceived direction of the double-drift illusion.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Assessing the Effect of the Refresh Rate of a Device on Various Motion Stimulation Frequencies Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potentials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- A micromirror array with annular partitioning for high-speed random-access axial focusing.Light, science & applications · 2020Article
- Temporal information loss in the macaque early visual system.PLoS biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under optimal conditions, just 3-6 ms of visual stimulation suffices for humans to see motion. Motion perception on this timescale implies that the visual system under these conditions reliably encodes, transmits, and processes neural signals with near-millisecond precision. Motivated by in vitro evidence for high temporal precision of motion signals in the primate retina, we investigated how neuronal and perceptual limits of motion encoding relate. Specifically, we examined the correspondence between the time scale at which cat retinal ganglion cells in vivo represent motion information and temporal thresholds for human motion discrimination. The timescale for motion encoding by ganglion cells ranged from 4.6 to 91 ms, and depended non-linearly on temporal frequency, but not on contrast. Human psychophysics revealed that minimal stimulus durations required for perceiving motion direction were similarly brief, 5.6-65 ms, and similarly depended on temporal frequency but, above ~10%, not on contrast. Notably, physiological and psychophysical measurements corresponded closely throughout (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.