Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735533›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020

State criminal justice policy context and opioid agonist treatment delivery among opioid treatment admissions, 2015.

Shivani Mantha, Pia M Mauro, Christine M Mauro, Silvia S Martins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shivani ManthaColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, United States. Electronic address: sm4244@caa.columbia.edu.
Pia M MauroColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, United States.
Christine M MauroColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, United States.
Silvia S MartinsColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, United States.
Columbia University · US

Funding

State medical marijuana laws and NSDUH marijuana use and consequences since 2004R01DA037866 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTINS, SILVIA SABOIA · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Multi-level associations between medical marijuana laws and substance use disorder treatmentK01DA045224 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAURO, PIA M. · 2018 to 2022
$878k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA045224NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA042436NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCriminal justice referral to treatment is associated with reduced odds of receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT), the gold-standard treatment for opioid use disorder. States vary substantially in the extent of criminal justice system involvement in opioid treatment; however, the effects on treatment provision are not clear. We examined whether state-level criminal justice involvement in the substance use treatment system modified the association between criminal justice referral to treatment and OAT provision among opioid treatment admissions.

methodsWe conducted a random effects logistic regression to investigate how the effects of criminal justice referral to treatment on OAT provision differed in states with high vs. low state-level criminal justice involvement in opioid treatment, adjusting for individual and state-level covariates, among 22 states in the 2015 Treatment Episode Dataset-Admissions.

resultsCriminal justice referral to treatment was associated with an 85% reduction in the odds of receiving OAT, compared to other sources of treatment referral (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.16). Among opioid treatment admissions resulting from criminal justice referral in 2015, receiving treatment in high criminal justice involvement states was associated with a 63% reduction in the odds of OAT provision, compared to opioid treatment received in low criminal justice involvement states (interaction OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.89).

conclusionThe effects of criminal justice referral to treatment on OAT provision varied by criminal justice involvement in opioid treatment at the state level. Targeted interventions should increase access to OAT in states that rely on the criminal justice system for opioid treatment referrals.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidCriminal LawFemaleHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMandatory ProgramsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPolicyReferral and ConsultationState GovernmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCriminal justiceMedication assisted treatmentMedication for opioid use disorderMethadoneOpioid agonist treatment (OAT)Opioid use disorderState policySubstance use treatment access

Identifiers

PMID31735533
PMCPMC7377924
OpenAlexW2986139413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.