Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735150›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

The neurobiology of innate, volitional and learned vocalizations in mammals and birds.

Andreas Nieder, Richard Mooney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distress vocalizations ofCurrent zoology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research square · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Vocal mimicry in Corvids.Animal cognition · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Primate ACC encodes natural vocal interactions in a 'cocktail party'.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Neuronal activity underlying vocal production in bats.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas NiederAnimal Physiology Unit, Institute of Neurobiology, University Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Richard MooneyDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Duke University · USUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Mechanisms for internally and externally guided sensorimotor learningR01NS099288 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2016 to 2025
$3.9M
Motor Modulation of Auditory ProcessingR01DC013826 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D · 2015 to 2025
$3.8M
Using Genetic Tools to Dissect Neural Circuits for Social CommunicationR01MH117778 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOONEY, RICHARD D, WANG, FAN · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vocalization is an ancient vertebrate trait essential to many forms of communication, ranging from courtship calls to free verse. Vocalizations may be entirely innate and evoked by sexual cues or emotional state, as with many types of calls made in primates, rodents and birds; volitional, as with innate calls that, following extensive training, can be evoked by arbitrary sensory cues in non-human primates and corvid songbirds; or learned, acoustically flexible and complex, as with human speech and the courtship songs of oscine songbirds. This review compares and contrasts the neural mechanisms underlying innate, volitional and learned vocalizations, with an emphasis on functional studies in primates, rodents and songbirds. This comparison reveals both highly conserved and convergent mechanisms of vocal production in these different groups, despite their often vast phylogenetic separation. This similarity of central mechanisms for different forms of vocal production presents experimentalists with useful avenues for gaining detailed mechanistic insight into how vocalizations are employed for social and sexual signalling, and how they can be modified through experience to yield new vocal repertoires customized to the individual's social group. This article is part of the theme issue 'What can animal communication teach us about human language?'

Indexed as

NeurobiologyAnimalsBirdsBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleHumansLanguageLearningMaleMammalsMotor CortexNeuronsPhylogenyPrimatesProsencephalonmonkeymousesongbirdvocalizationvocal pathways

Identifiers

PMID31735150
PMCPMC6895551
OpenAlexW2984154005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.