Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735145›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Becoming human: human infants link language and cognition, but what about the other great apes?

Miriam A Novack, Sandra Waxman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Talking About the Absent and the Abstract: Referential Communication in Language and Gesture.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. What can animal communication teach us about human language?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam A NovackDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Sandra WaxmanDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Linking language and cognition in infancy: Entry points and developmental changeR01HD083310 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WAXMAN, SANDRA R · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
Infant attention in the context of languageF32HD095580 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI NOVACK, MIRIAM ALANA · 2018 to 2020
$120k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD095580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language has no parallel elsewhere in the animal kingdom. It is unique not only for its structural complexity but also for its inextricable interface with core cognitive capacities such as object representation, object categorization and abstract rule learning. Here, we (i) review recent evidence documenting how (and how early) language interacts with these core cognitive capacities in the mind of the human infant, and (ii) consider whether this link exists in non-human great apes-our closest genealogical cousins. Research with human infants demonstrates that well before they begin to speak, infants have already forged a link between language and core cognitive capacities. Evident by just three months of age, this language-cognition link unfolds in a rich developmental cascade, with each advance providing the foundation for subsequent, more precise and more powerful links. This link supports our species' capacity to represent and convey abstract concepts and to communicate beyond the immediate here and now. By contrast, although the communication systems of great apes are sophisticated in their own right, there is no conclusive evidence that apes establish reference, convey information declaratively or pass down communicative devices via cultural transmission. Thus, the evidence currently available reinforces the uniqueness of human language and the power of its interface to cognition. This article is part of the theme issue 'What can animal communication teach us about human language?'

Indexed as

LanguageAnimal CommunicationAnimalsChild DevelopmentCognitionCommunicationHominidaeHumansInfantLanguage DevelopmentMental ProcessesSpeechcognitioncommunicationgestureinfancylanguageprimates

Identifiers

PMID31735145
PMCPMC6895556
OpenAlexW2988812701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.