Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31734935›Full record

ArticleEndocrine pathology2019

Using a Novel Diagnostic Nomogram to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Parathyroid Neoplasms.

Angelica M Silva-Figueroa, Roland Bassett, Ioannis Christakis, Pablo Moreno, Callisia N Clarke, Naifa L Busaidy, Elizabeth G Grubbs, Jeffrey E Lee, Nancy D Perrier, Michelle D Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Avoiding overdiagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angelica M Silva-FigueroaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4992-7072
Roland BassettDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ioannis ChristakisDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Pablo MorenoDivision of Endocrine Surgery, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Callisia N ClarkeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Medical College Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Naifa L BusaidyDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth G GrubbsDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jeffrey E LeeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Nancy D PerrierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. nperrier@mdanderson.org.
Michelle D WilliamsDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 85, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. mdwillia@mdanerson.org.

Funding

Cancer Center Support Grant NCI Grant P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to develop an immunohistochemical (IHC) tool to support the diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma (PC) and help differentiate it from atypical parathyroid neoplasms (atypical) and benign adenomas. Distinguishing PC from benign parathyroid neoplasms can be challenging. Many cases of PC are histopathologically borderline for definitive malignancy. Recently, individual IHC biomarkers have been evaluated to aid in discrimination between parathyroid neoplasms. PC, atypical parathyroid neoplasms, and parathyroid adenomas treated at our institution from 1997 to 2014 were studied retrospectively. IHC analysis was performed to evaluate parafibromin, retinoblastoma (RB), protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5), Ki67, galectin-3, and E-cadherin expression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariable logistic regression model for combinations of biomarkers were evaluated to classify patients as PC or atypical/adenoma. A diagnostic nomogram using 5 biomarkers was created for PC. Sixty-three patients were evaluated. The percent staining of parafibromin (p < 0.0001), RB (p = 0.04), Ki67 (p = 0.02), PGP9.5 (p = 0.04), and Galectin-3 (p = 0.01) differed significantly in the three diagnostic groups. ROC analysis demonstrated that parafibromin had the best performance in discriminating PC from atypical/adenoma; area under the curve (AUC) was 81% (cutoff, 92.5%; sensitivity rate, 64%; specificity rate, 87%). We created a diagnostic nomogram using a combination of biomarkers; AUC was 84.9% (95% confidence interval, 73.4-96.4%). The optimism-adjusted AUC for this model was 80.5% (mean absolute error, 0.043). A diagnostic nomogram utilizing an immunoexpression, a combination of immunohistochemical biomarkers, can be used to help differentiate PC from other parathyroid neoplasms, thus potentially improving diagnostic classification.

Indexed as

NomogramsAdenomaAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParathyroid NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersNomogramsParathyroid cancerParathyroid neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.