ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020
Risk of colorectal cancer in users of bisphosphonates: analysis of population-based electronic health records.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Bisphosphonates for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Meta-Analytic Reappraisal Beyond Bone Health.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the Chemopreventive Effect of Medication on Gene Expression Linked to Colorectal Cancer: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Healthy Colon Mucosa.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Observational
- Electronic health records and patient registries in medical oncology departments in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of bisphosphonates has been associated with a decrease in the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in observational studies, but with controversial results and difficult to interpret because of routine concomitant use of calcium and vitamin D. We aimed to assess the association between CRC risk and outpatient exposure to antiosteoporotic drugs using a large cohort with prescription data in Catalonia. A case-control study was performed using the Information System for Development of Primary Care Research (SIDIAP) which is a primary care medical record database that has linked data on reimbursed medication. The study included 25,836 cases with an incident diagnosis of CRC between 2010 and 2015 and 129,117 matched controls by age (± 5 years), sex and healthcare region. A multivariable model was built adjusting for known risk factors and comorbidities that were significantly associated to CRC in the dataset, and a propensity score for bisphosphonates. Tests for interaction for multiple drug use and stratified analysis for tumour location were prospectively planned. Overall 18,230 individuals (11.5%) were users of bisphosphonates. A significant but modest protective effect on CRC was observed for bisphosphonates (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99), that was no longer significant when adjusted for calcium and vitamin D (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.03). Bisphosphonates, however, showed a dose-response effect with duration of use even when adjusted for calcium and vitamin D (OR for use > 40 months: 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-1.00, P value for trend: 0.018). The use of bisphosphonates was associated with a modest decrease in the risk of CRC, but this effect was essentially explained by concomitant use of calcium or vitamin D. The observed protective effect was stronger for long durations of use, which deserves further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.