Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31734874›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Ninety-Six Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Study in Patients with GERD Shows that Restrictive Diet Reduces Esophageal Acid Exposure.

George Triadafilopoulos, Julia Wilhelmina Korzilius, Thomas Zikos, Irene Sonu, Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker, Linda Nguyen, John O Clarke

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George TriadafilopoulosStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. vagt@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-3773
Julia Wilhelmina KorziliusStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Thomas ZikosStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Irene SonuStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Nielsen Q Fernandez-BeckerStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Linda NguyenStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
John O ClarkeStanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged (96 h) pH monitoring may explore the effect of diet on pH and symptoms in patients with GERD.

aimsTo assess the usefulness of a 96 h esophageal pH study in patients with GER symptoms under different diets (pro- and anti-GER).

methodsProspective study of 66 patients with GERD undergoing wireless 96 h pH monitoring. Two-day periods, one on liberal (pro-reflux) and another on restricted (anti-reflux) diet assessed esophageal acid exposure and symptoms. The primary end point was normalization of acid exposure time while on restricted diet. Secondary end point was a > 50% reduction in symptoms with restricted diet.

resultsNormal (pH time < 4 of < 6%) was found in 34 patients (51.5%) while on the initial 48 h (liberal) diet [median % time < 4: 3.2 (95% CI, 1.9, 4.0)] and remained normal while on restricted diet [median % time < 4: 2.6 (95% CI, 0.8, 3.4)]. Abnormal acid exposure (% pH time < 4: > 6%) was found in 32 patients (48.5%) while on initial 48 h liberal diet [median % time < 4: 10.5, (95% CI 8.9, 12.6)], and decreased significantly with restricted diet [median % time < 4: 4.5 (95% CI 3.1, 7.3)] (p = 0.001), and normalized with anti-GERD diet in 21 patients (65.6%). Only 11/66 patients were candidates for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use; 34 had either normal pH studies or normalized them with restricted diet (n = 21). Symptoms did not improve with restricted diet.

conclusionsThe 96-h esophageal pH study tests for GERD under pro- and anti-GER diets and allows minimization of PPI therapy to only 16.6% of patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal pH MonitoringMonitoring, AmbulatoryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultDietEsophageal ambulatory pH monitoringGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)High-resolution impedance manometry (HRM)Proton pump inhibitors (PPI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.