Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31734797›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Effectiveness of adjunctive nebulized antibiotics in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections.

Leire Leache, Irene Aquerreta, Azucena Aldaz, Pablo Monedero, Antonio Idoate, Ana Ortega

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thoracic trauma WSES-AAST guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Future Trends in Nebulized Therapies for Pulmonary Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leire LeachePharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2272-7086
Irene AquerretaPharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Azucena AldazPharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Pablo MonederoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Antonio IdoatePharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana OrtegaPharmacy Services, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Avenida Pío XII 36, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. aortega@unav.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1456-2437
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of adding nebulized antibiotics to systemic antimicrobials in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections (pneumonia or tracheobronchitis) and the effect on renal function. A retrospective observational cohort study including critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections during a 2-year period was conducted. Intervention group included patients that received nebulized and systemic antimicrobials. Patients in the control group received only systemic antimicrobials. Clinical resolution was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included change in fever, inflammatory parameters, and creatinine clearance; length of hospital stay, systemic therapy, and mechanical ventilation; hospital readmission; and mortality. Regression models were performed to estimate the effect of nebulized antibiotics on outcome variables adjusted by potential confounders. A total of 136 patients were included (93 in control group and 43 in intervention group). The intervention group had higher odds of clinical resolution (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 7.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.2, 43.3). Nebulized antibiotic therapy was independently associated with reduction in procalcitonin (adjusted OR: 12.4; 95% CI: 1.4, 109.7). There were no significant differences in the rest of the secondary outcomes or in creatinine clearance reduction. Adding nebulized antibiotics for the management of respiratory tract infections has a positive impact on clinical resolution without increasing the risk of renal toxicity.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdministration, IntravenousAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCritical IllnessDrug Administration RoutesFemaleHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAntiinfective agentAntimicrobial agentCritical careCritically illInhalationNebulizerRespiratory infection

Identifiers

PMID31734797
PMCPMC7223945
OpenAlexW2987546218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.