ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Inhibition-related differences between tic-free and tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from the N2 and P3.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Analysis of Event-Related Potentials of Response Inhibition: The Role of Negative Urgency and Compulsivity.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Identifying emotional components of event-related potentials in the brain functioning of individuals with contamination obsessions and comparison with healthy control group.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- P3b Amplitude and Latency in Tic Disorders: A Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- A Review on P300 in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tic-related OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder) was introduced as an OCD subtype in the DSM-5 based mainly on family and clinical data that showed differences between OCD in dependence of accompanying tics. Little is known, however, regarding neurocognitive differences between subtypes. We used the stop-signal task to examine whether differences exist in response inhibition between OCD patients without tics (n = 21), patients with tic-related OCD (n = 12), and 21 healthy controls. The groups were carefully matched for gender, age and level of education. The stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and inhibition-related N2 and P3 were used to examine behavioral and neural correlates of response inhibition and inhibition-related processes. In the SSRT, no difference was found between groups. P3 amplitude was larger in tic-free compared to tic-related OCD and healthy controls. No group differences were found in the N2 amplitude. For tic-related OCD, SSRT data indicate intact response inhibition, and P3 data indicate intact neural aftereffects of inhibition like the evaluation of the outcome. This is similar to what is found in patients with TD and may, thus, be interpreted as a support for shared mechanisms in relation to TD. In OCD, alterations in P3 amplitude indicate hyperactivity in the evaluation of the outcome of the inhibition process. This is in line with hyperactivity generally found in performance monitoring in OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31734785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.