Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31734785›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Inhibition-related differences between tic-free and tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from the N2 and P3.

L Kloft, A Riesel, N Kathmann

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L KloftDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. kloftliv@psychologie.hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-1129
A RieselDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
N KathmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KL 2766/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tic-related OCD (obsessive-compulsive disorder) was introduced as an OCD subtype in the DSM-5 based mainly on family and clinical data that showed differences between OCD in dependence of accompanying tics. Little is known, however, regarding neurocognitive differences between subtypes. We used the stop-signal task to examine whether differences exist in response inhibition between OCD patients without tics (n = 21), patients with tic-related OCD (n = 12), and 21 healthy controls. The groups were carefully matched for gender, age and level of education. The stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) and inhibition-related N2 and P3 were used to examine behavioral and neural correlates of response inhibition and inhibition-related processes. In the SSRT, no difference was found between groups. P3 amplitude was larger in tic-free compared to tic-related OCD and healthy controls. No group differences were found in the N2 amplitude. For tic-related OCD, SSRT data indicate intact response inhibition, and P3 data indicate intact neural aftereffects of inhibition like the evaluation of the outcome. This is similar to what is found in patients with TD and may, thus, be interpreted as a support for shared mechanisms in relation to TD. In OCD, alterations in P3 amplitude indicate hyperactivity in the evaluation of the outcome of the inhibition process. This is in line with hyperactivity generally found in performance monitoring in OCD.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300Evoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeTic DisordersEEGElectroencephalographyN2Obsessive–compulsive disorderP3Response inhibitionTic disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.