Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31734700›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2020

Patient Perceptions and Familiarity With Medical Therapy for Heart Failure.

Marc D Samsky, Li Lin, Stephen J Greene, Steven J Lippmann, Pamela N Peterson, Paul A Heidenreich, Warren K Laskey, Clyde W Yancy, Melissa A Greiner, N Chantelle Hardy and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure: Overcoming Challenges and Maximizing Benefits.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marc D SamskyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Li LinDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Stephen J GreeneDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Steven J LippmannDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Pamela N PetersonDivision of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Paul A HeidenreichDepartment of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Warren K LaskeyDivision of Cardiology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque.
Clyde W YancyDivision of Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Melissa A GreinerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
N Chantelle HardyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Abhishek KavatiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Siyeon ParkDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore.
Robert J MentzDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Gregg C FonarowAhmanson-University of California, Los Angeles, Cardiomyopathy Center, University of California, Los Angeles.
Emily C O'BrienDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are major gaps in use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure (HF). Patient-reported data outlining patient goals and preferences associated with GDMT are not available. Objective: To survey patients with chronic HF to better understand their experiences and perceptions of living with HF, including their familiarity and concerns with important GDMT therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: Study participants were recruited from the GfK KnowledgePanel, a probability-sampled online panel representative of the US adult population. English-speaking adults who met the following criteria were eligible if they were (1) previously told by a physician that they had HF; (2) currently taking medications for HF; and (3) had no history of left ventricular assist device or cardiac transplant. Data were collected between October and November 2018. Analysis began in December 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The survey included 4 primary domains: (1) relative importance of disease-related goals, (2) challenges associated with living with HF, (3) decision-making process associated with HF medication use, and (4) awareness and concerns about available HF medications. Results: Of 30 707 KnowledgePanel members who received the initial survey, 15 091 (49.1%) completed the screening questions, 440 were eligible and began the survey, and 429 completed the survey. The median (interquartile range) age was 68 (60-75) years and most were white (320 [74.6%]), male (304 [70.9%]), and had at least a high school education (409 [95.3%]). Most survey responders reported familiarity with β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics. Overall, 107 (24.9%) reported familiarity with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Overall, 136 patients (42.5%) reported have safety concerns regarding angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and 133 (38.5%) regarding β-blockers, 35 (37.9%) regarding mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 38 (36.5%) regarding angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and 123 (37.2%) regarding diuretics. Between 27.7% (n = 26) and 38.5% (n = 136) reported concerns regarding the effectiveness of β-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, or diuretics, while 41% (n = 132) were concerned with the effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, many patients were not familiar with GDMT for HF, with familiarity lowest for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Among patients not familiar with these therapies, significant proportions questioned their effectiveness and/or safety. Enhanced patient education and shared decision-making support may be effective strategies to improve the uptake of GDMT for HF in US clinical practice.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGoalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsDiureticsFemaleFocus GroupsHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNeprilysinAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsDiureticsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNeprilysin

Identifiers

PMID31734700
PMCPMC6865328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.