ArticleWorld neurosurgery2020
Noncontrast T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences for Long-Term Monitoring of Asymptomatic Convexity Meningiomas.
Article in World neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Green MRI for neuroimaging: monitoring brain tumors using non-contrast sequences.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Initial insights into post-contrast enhancement in ultra-low-field MRI: Case Report.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Lower Gadolinium Doses for MR Imaging of Meningiomas: How Low Can We Go?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Spontaneous regression of a posterior fossa meningioma: A case report.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- Is Contrast Medium Really Needed for Follow-up MRI of Untreated Intracranial Meningiomas?AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) used to enhance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have been linked to tissue deposition, including in the brain. The management of indolent tumors such as meningiomas requires frequent MRI scans to monitor for interval growth. Given concern regarding GBCA deposition, we sought to determine if noncontrast MRI scans in patients with asymptomatic meningiomas were equivalent to GBCA-enhanced MRI scans in surveillance monitoring.
methodsThis institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review included 106 MRI sequences from 18 patients. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with asymptomatic meningiomas who received baseline contrast-enhanced and noncontrast axial brain MRI scan. Exclusion criteria included the following: 1) baseline or follow-up axial images were not available for review, 2) baseline scan was obtained without contrast, and 3) diagnosis of meningioma was uncertain. Percent tumor growth was measured by comparing cross-sectional area at maximum tumor diameter from the earliest and most recent scans. For each patient, change in tumor size over time was compared using T1 + contrast, T2, and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences. These were compared with a qualitative consensus reading by a neurosurgeon and a neuroradiologist.
resultsMeasured change of greater than 10% was taken to represent tumor growth. In 17 out of 18 patients, measurement of noncontrast studies (T2 and T2 FLAIR) matched consensus. For one patient, imaging on T2 suggested 11% growth, whereas T2 FLAIR and overall consensus was stability.
conclusionsOur study provides evidence that noncontrasted MRI scans are equivalent to contrast-weighted MRI scans to follow change in tumor size over time in asymptomatic meningiomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.