ArticleJournal of anxiety disorders2019
If we build it, will they come? And will they stay? Commentary on Holmes et al. "Examining patterns of dose response for clients who do and do not complete Cognitive Processing Therapy".
Article in Journal of anxiety disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although evidence-based practice is becoming more widely accepted, the issue of patient preference has been relatively ignored. As noted by Holmes and colleagues (2019), when delivered in a community setting, Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) can have a relatively high dropout rate (42 % in the Holmes et al., 2019). In this commentary, issues about the conceptualization of treatment dropout as one index of patient preference are discussed. Dropout can be conceptualized as a potential reflection of poor fit between the patient and a specific empirically-supported treatment. Consideration of ways in which an empirically-supported treatment can be personalized, while remaining true to its underlying principles, are discussed using CPT as an example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31734028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.