ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
A case of tracheal obstruction caused by reflux and aspiration of semi-solid nutrients via the nasogastric tube.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of a quality improvement programme on the preparation and administration of medications via a nasoenteral feeding tube: 2014-2019 intervention study.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Efficacy of semi-solidification of enteral nutrients for postoperative nutritional management with a nasogastric tube.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSemi-solid nutrients have several advantages, including reduced cases of diarrhea and aspiration pneumonia, and are usually administered via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy owing to its high viscosity. Administering semi-solid nutrients via a nasogastric tube was recently introduced in clinical practice; however, its safety has not been well confirmed. PRESENTATION OF CASE: An 82-year-old man with a right occipital hemorrhage and severe diarrhea consulted the nutritional support team. Administrations of semi-solid nutrients (HINE E-GEL®) via the nasogastric tube was initiated, which gradually alleviated his symptoms. Fourteen days after initiation, he suddenly had pulmonary failure owing to a tracheal obstruction caused by the reflux and aspiration of semi-solid nutrients. Intubation and subsequent reflex cough expectorated sputum with gel-form particles, which quickly stabilized his pulmonary condition. After this, his hospital course was stable, and he was referred to another hospital for further rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: Semi-solid nutrients administered via the nasogastric tube have different ingredients compared with those administered via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. HINE E-GEL®, for example, contains pectin and calcium phosphate that changes from liquid to semi-solid inside the stomach via chemical reactions under acidic conditions. Data on the viscosity of HINE E-GEL® in vivo are insufficient. Uncertainty regarding the form and viscosity of HINE E-GEL® inside the stomach complicates clinical practice.
conclusionsAlthough semi-solid nutrients have several advantages, including reduced diarrhea and gastroesophageal reflux, evidence on semi-solid nutrients via the nasogastric tube is insufficient. It should be noted that semi-solid nutrient reflux can be more fatal than liquid nutrients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.