Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31733372›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Neural representations of phonology in temporal cortex scaffold longitudinal reading gains in 5- to 7-year-old children.

Jin Wang, Marc F Joanisse, James R Booth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuro-cognitive development of semantic and syntactic bootstrapping in 7- to 9-year-old children.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The behavioral and neurobiological relationships between executive function and reading: A review and preliminary findings.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jin WangDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: jin.wang@vanderbilt.edu.
Marc F JoanisseDepartment of Psychology & Brain and Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
James R BoothDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Interactive Specialization in Language ImpairmentR01DC013274 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BOOTH, JAMES R · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether phonological processes measured through brain activation are crucial for the development of reading skill (i.e. scaffolding hypothesis) and/or whether learning to read words fine-tunes phonology in the brain (i.e. refinement hypothesis). We specifically looked at how different grain sizes in two brain regions implicated in phonological processing played a role in this bidirectional relation. According to the dual-stream model of speech processing and previous empirical studies, the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) appears to be a perceptual region associated with phonological representations, whereas the dorsal inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) appears to be an articulatory region that accesses phonological representations in STG during more difficult tasks. 36 children completed a reading test outside the scanner and an auditory phonological task which included both small (i.e. onset) and large (i.e. rhyme) grain size conditions inside the scanner when they were 5.5-6.5 years old (Time 1) and once again approximately 1.5 years later (Time 2). To study the scaffolding hypothesis, a regression analysis was carried out by entering brain activation in either STG or IFG for either small (onset > perceptual) or large (rhyme > perceptual) grain size phonological processing at T1 as the predictors and reading skill at T2 as the dependent measure, with several covariates of no interest included. To study the refinement hypothesis, the regression analysis included reading skill at T1 as the predictor and brain activation in either STG or IFG for either small or large grain size phonological processing at T2 as the dependent measures, with several covariates of no interest included. We found that only posterior STG, regardless of grain size, was predictive of reading gains. Parallel models with only behavioral accuracy were not significant. Taken together, our results suggest that the representational quality of phonology in temporal cortex is crucial for reading development. Moreover, our study provides neural evidence supporting the scaffolding hypothesis, suggesting that brain measures of phonology could be helpful in early identification of reading difficulties.

Indexed as

ReadingBrainBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysSpeech PerceptionTemporal LobeAccessGrain sizeOnsetPhonologyRefinementRepresentationRhymeScaffolding

Identifiers

PMID31733372
PMCPMC8947253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.