Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31733343›Full record

ReviewCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2020

The tenacious brain: How the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals.

Alexandra Touroutoglou, Joseph Andreano, Bradford C Dickerson, Lisa Feldman Barrett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Initial learning in the brain: From rules to action.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Separating desire from prediction of outcome value.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra TouroutoglouDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Electronic address: atouroutoglou@mgh.harvard.edu.
Joseph AndreanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Bradford C DickersonDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Northeastern University, Department of Psychology, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Alberto Serrano-Pozo · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
Affect regulation and Beta Amyloid: Maturational Factors in Aging and Age-Related PathologyR01MH113234 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKERSON, BRADFORD C, ISAACOWITZ, DEREK M · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
Ovarian Effects on Intrinsic Connectivity and the Affective Enhancement of MemoryR01MH109464 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ANDREANO, JOSEPH M, BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
TMS in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Modulation of Brain Networks and LanguageK23DC016912 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TOUROUTOGLOU, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2023
$871k
Biopsychosocial Mechanisms of SuperagingR56AG058745 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, DICKERSON, BRADFORD C · 2018 to 2018
$832k
Noninvasive brain stimulation as a tool to study the role of motivation in age-related cognitive abilitiesR21AG061743 · NIA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI RAMPERSAD, SUMIENTRA MARIJKE, TOUROUTOGLOU, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2020
$450k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061743NIA NIH HHS R56 AG058745NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC016912NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109464NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tenacity-persistence in the face of challenge-has received increasing attention, particularly because it contributes to better academic achievement, career opportunities and health outcomes. We review evidence from non-human primate neuroanatomy and structural and functional neuroimaging in humans suggesting that the anterior mid cingulate cortex (aMCC) is an important network hub in the brain that performs the cost/benefit computations necessary for tenacity. Specifically, we propose that its position as a structural and functional hub allows the aMCC to integrate signals from diverse brain systems to predict energy requirements that are needed for attention allocation, encoding of new information, and physical movement, all in the service of goal attainment. We review and integrate research findings from studies of attention, reward, memory, affect, multimodal sensory integration, and motor control to support this hypothesis. We close by discussing the implications of our framework for educational achievement, exercise and eating disorders, successful aging, and neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression and dementia.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingGyrus CinguliHumansMemoryMovementNeural PathwaysAnterior mid-cingulate cortexEnergy regulationTenacity

Identifiers

PMID31733343
PMCPMC7381101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.