Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31733217›Full record

ReviewProgress in cardiovascular diseases

The 2018 AHA/ACC/Multi-Society Cholesterol guidelines: Looking at past, present and future.

Neil J Stone, Scott M Grundy

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Lp(a) in the Horizon of Diagnostics and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy in Patients at Low-to-Moderate Cardiovascular Risk.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Statin Therapy in Very Old Patients: Lights and Shadows.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. PURL: How old is too old for statins?The Journal of family practice · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Neil J StoneNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: n-stone@northwestern.edu.
Scott M GrundyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States of America.
Northwestern University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors review more than three decades of progress in providing clinicians and patients with guidance on risk assessment, patient evaluation and cholesterol management. Beginning with the National Cholesterol Education Program's Initial Adult Treatment Panel report, the cholesterol guidelines increasingly reflect the progress made in understanding the benefits of improved lifestyle and nutrition to improve lipid profiles, major risk factors and reduce ASCVD risk. Moreover, they now provide qualitative and quantitative assessment tools to guide appropriate risk reduction LDL-C lowering therapy. Use of the Pooled Cohort Equations to determine Low, Borderline, Intermediate and High 10-year ASCVD risk is now joined by recognition of conditions and biomarkers that enhance ASCVD risk. This personalizes the risk discussion for the patient. An important addition is the selective use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring to reclassify risk in patients at borderline or intermediate risk, but for whom a risk decision regarding statin therapy is uncertain. In secondary prevention, current guidelines provide criteria for determining a "very high" risk group in whom risk is especially high and in whom aggressive LDL-C lowering can be shown to provide increased absolute benefit. Current guidelines provide a comprehensive look at children and adolescents, young adults, elderly, women and issues specific to women through the life course. They provide guidance for those adults at risk due to severe hypercholesterolemia, persistent hypertriglyceridemia after secondary causes have been addressed, those with inflammatory disorders and HIV, those adults with chronic kidney disease, and those affected by issues of race/ethnicity. They conclude with a brief summary of recommendations emphasizing important concepts for providing safety with LDL-C lowering therapy. This combination of best external evidence and clinical expertise from the expert panel should provide a solid foundation for lipid management of patients at risk for or with clinical ASCVD.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePractice Guidelines as TopicAnticholesteremic AgentsBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterolDiffusion of InnovationDyslipidemiasForecastingHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansProtective FactorsRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnticholesteremic AgentsBiomarkersCholesterolCholesterolLipid guidelinesPCSK9 inhibitorsStatins

Identifiers

PMID31733217
OpenAlexW2987503079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.