ReviewProgress in cardiovascular diseases
The 2018 AHA/ACC/Multi-Society Cholesterol guidelines: Looking at past, present and future.
Review in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of more intensive lipid-lowering therapy on cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Xuezhitong in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia: a Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Simulation, Positive Drug and Placebo Parallel Control Study.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2020Trial
- Statin Use and Arterial Calcification in the General Population: A Longitudinal Analysis and a Negative Control Population.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Lp(a) in the Horizon of Diagnostics and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Serum PCSK9 is not independently associated with dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetes: a paired cross-sectional study.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2025Article
- Obesity Biomarkers: Exploring Factors, Ramification, Machine Learning, and AI-Unveiling Insights in Health Research.MedComm · 2025Review
- Management of Elderly Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Yonsei medical journal · 2025Review
- Disparities in Guideline Concordant Statin Treatment in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2023Article
- The association between atherogenic index of plasma and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease-specific mortality in hypertension patients: a retrospective cohort study of NHANES.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Serum total bilirubin and one-year prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease and psoriasis.iScience · 2023Article
- Review
- Traditional and Non-traditional Lipid Profiles in Bosnian Patients with Probable Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2022Article
- Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy in Patients at Low-to-Moderate Cardiovascular Risk.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022Review
- High-density lipoproteins, reverse cholesterol transport and atherogenesis.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs.Pharmacological reviews · 2021Article
- Statin Therapy in Very Old Patients: Lights and Shadows.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Decreased Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Indicates Poor Prognosis of Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Obesity and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Narrative Review.Rheumatology and therapy · 2020Review
- PURL: How old is too old for statins?The Journal of family practice · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The authors review more than three decades of progress in providing clinicians and patients with guidance on risk assessment, patient evaluation and cholesterol management. Beginning with the National Cholesterol Education Program's Initial Adult Treatment Panel report, the cholesterol guidelines increasingly reflect the progress made in understanding the benefits of improved lifestyle and nutrition to improve lipid profiles, major risk factors and reduce ASCVD risk. Moreover, they now provide qualitative and quantitative assessment tools to guide appropriate risk reduction LDL-C lowering therapy. Use of the Pooled Cohort Equations to determine Low, Borderline, Intermediate and High 10-year ASCVD risk is now joined by recognition of conditions and biomarkers that enhance ASCVD risk. This personalizes the risk discussion for the patient. An important addition is the selective use of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring to reclassify risk in patients at borderline or intermediate risk, but for whom a risk decision regarding statin therapy is uncertain. In secondary prevention, current guidelines provide criteria for determining a "very high" risk group in whom risk is especially high and in whom aggressive LDL-C lowering can be shown to provide increased absolute benefit. Current guidelines provide a comprehensive look at children and adolescents, young adults, elderly, women and issues specific to women through the life course. They provide guidance for those adults at risk due to severe hypercholesterolemia, persistent hypertriglyceridemia after secondary causes have been addressed, those with inflammatory disorders and HIV, those adults with chronic kidney disease, and those affected by issues of race/ethnicity. They conclude with a brief summary of recommendations emphasizing important concepts for providing safety with LDL-C lowering therapy. This combination of best external evidence and clinical expertise from the expert panel should provide a solid foundation for lipid management of patients at risk for or with clinical ASCVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.