ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2020
Impact of Free-Breathing Phase-Contrast MRI on Decision-Making in Fontan Surgical Planning.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Trial
- Computational Investigation of Anastomosis Options of a Right-Heart Pump to Patient Specific Pulmonary Arteries.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2021Article
- The Influence of Respiration on Blood Flow in the Fontan Circulation: Insights for Imaging-Based Clinical Evaluation of the Total Cavopulmonary Connection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fontan surgical planning ranks proposed surgical options according to their hemodynamics assessed by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling. CFD commonly utilizes blood flow acquired under breath-holding (BH) conditions. Ignoring the free-breathing (FB) effect on blood flow waveforms may impact the ranking of surgical options. This study investigates such a potential impact by including ten Fontan patients who had blood flow acquisitions under both BH and FB conditions. A virtual surgery platform was used to generate two surgical options for each patient: (1) a traditional Fontan conduit and (2) a Y-graft. These options were ranked based on clinically relevant hemodynamic metrics: power loss (PL) and hepatic flow distribution (HFD). No difference was found in the ranking of options between using FB and BH flow acquisitions. The findings indicated that decision-making is not affected by the types of flow acquisition for Fontan surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.