Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31732868›Full record

Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2020

An observational analysis of meal patterns in overweight and obese pregnancy: exploring meal pattern behaviours and the association with maternal and fetal health measures.

Kate M Ainscough, Maria A Kennelly, Karen L Lindsay, Eileen C O'Brien, Elizabeth J O'Sullivan, John Mehegan, Eileen R Gibney, Fionnuala M McAuliffe

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kate M AinscoughUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria A KennellyUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Karen L LindsayUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eileen C O'BrienUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Elizabeth J O'SullivanUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John MeheganUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Eileen R GibneyUCD Institute of Food and Health, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Fionnuala M McAuliffeUCD Perinatal Research Centre, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. fionnuala.mcauliffe@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3477-6494
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

National Maternity Hospital Medical Fund n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrient intakes are known to be poorer among pregnant women with raised body mass index (BMI) than those with a healthy BMI. While meal patterns have the potential to influence obstetric, metabolic and anthropometric measures for mother and infant, limited data exists regarding meal patterns among pregnant women with raised BMI.

aimTo identify categories of meal patterns among pregnant women with overweight and obesity and determine whether patterns change with advancing gestation. To determine if maternal meal patterns are associated with dietary intakes and pregnancy outcomes.

methodsProspective, observational analysis of pregnant women (n = 143) (BMI 25-39.9 kg/m

resultsThree meal pattern categories were identified: 'main meal dominant' (3 main eating occasions + 0-3 snacks), 'large meal dominant' (≤ 2 main eating occasions + < 2 snacks), and 'snack dominant' (3 main eating occasions + > 3 snacks and ≤ 2 main + ≥ 2 snacks). A main meal-dominant pattern prevailed at 16 weeks' (85.3%) and a snack-dominant pattern at 28 weeks' (68.5%). Dietary glycaemic index was lower among the main meal versus large meal-dominant pattern at 28 weeks (P = 0.018). Infant birth weight (kg) and macrosomia were highest among participants with a large meal-dominant pattern at 28 weeks (P = 0.030 and P = 0.008, respectively).

conclusionWomen with raised BMI changed eating patterns as pregnancy progressed, moving from main meal-dominant to snack-dominant patterns. Large meal-dominant meal patterns in later pregnancy were associated with higher glycaemic index and greater prevalence of macrosomia.

Indexed as

AdultFeeding BehaviorFemaleFetal MacrosomiaGestational Weight GainHumansMealsObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesDietary glycaemic indexInfant birth weightMaternal dietMeal pattern behaviourOverweight and obese pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31732868
OpenAlexW2984553966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.