Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31732867›Full record

Trial reportIrish journal of medical science2020

Comparison of analgesic effect, knee joint function recovery, and safety profiles between pre-operative and post-operative administrations of meloxicam in knee osteoarthritis patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty.

Yang Shao, Xiaoyan Zhao, Yu Zhai, Junfeng Yang, Shanfu Wang, Lei Liu, Jianwei Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang ShaoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 8 Zhongnan West Road, Wuxi, 214071, China.
Xiaoyan ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory, Kunshan Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, China.
Yu ZhaiDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Changzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, China.
Junfeng YangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 8 Zhongnan West Road, Wuxi, 214071, China.
Shanfu WangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 8 Zhongnan West Road, Wuxi, 214071, China.
Lei LiuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 8 Zhongnan West Road, Wuxi, 214071, China.
Jianwei WangDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Wuxi Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 8 Zhongnan West Road, Wuxi, 214071, China. jing07214480@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7710-1673
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pre-operative and post-operative meloxicam administration regarding post-operative pain control and knee joint function recovery in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsTotally, 196 KOA patients who underwent TKA were consecutively enrolled and randomly assigned into pre-operative (N = 98) and post-operative administration group (N = 98) as 1:1 ratio. Pre-operative administration group received meloxicam 15 mg at 24 h pre-operation and 7.5 mg at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-operation, respectively. Post-operative administration group received meloxicam 15 mg at 4 h post-operation and 7.5 mg at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-operation, respectively. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and at flexion, patient's global assessment (PGA), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, hospital for special surgery (HSS), knee score, and adverse events were assessed.

resultsPre-operative meloxicam administration attenuated pain VAS score at rest at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h; and pain VAS score at flexion at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h; as well as PGA score at 6 h, 12 h, 48 h post-TKA compared with post-operative meloxicam administration. Additional and total consumption of PCA were both decreased in pre-operative meloxicam administration group than post-operative meloxicam administration group, while HSS knee score at 3 months post-TKA was similar between pre-operative and post-operative meloxicam administration groups. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse events was of no difference between the two groups.

conclusionPre-operative administration of meloxicam might assist the post-operative pain management and care in KOA patients who underwent TKA.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesicsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMeloxicamOsteoarthritis, KneePostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CareRecovery of FunctionAnalgesicsMeloxicamEfficacyKnee osteoarthritisMeloxicamSafetyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31732867
OpenAlexW2986340159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.