ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2019
Semantic generalization of value-based attentional priority.
Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of selective attention in value-modulated attentional capture.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Value-modulated attentional capture depends on awareness.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Generalisation of value-based attentional priority is category-specific.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Differential effects of intra-modal and cross-modal reward value on perception: ERP evidence.PloS one · 2023Article
- Cross-modal generalization of value-based attentional priority.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2022Article
- An adaptive view of attentional control.The American psychologist · 2021Review
- The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Punishment-modulated attentional capture is context specific.Motivation science · 2021Article
- Semantic generalization of punishment-related attentional priority.Visual cognition · 2021Article
- Inertia in value-driven attention.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether attentional prioritization of stimuli associated with reward transfers across conceptual knowledge independently of physical features. Participants successively performed two color-word Stroop tasks. In the learning phase, neutral words were associated with high, low, or no monetary reward. In the generalization phase (in which no reward was delivered), synonyms of words previously paired with reward served as Stroop stimuli. Results are consistent with semantic generalization of stimulus-reward associations, with synonyms of high-value words impairing color-naming performance, although this effect was particular to participants who were unaware of the reward contingencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.