ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2020
Assessing Protein Sequence Database Suitability Using
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinguishing Ile/Leu Variant Ligands in the Immunopeptidome Using Hybrid EAD + CID Fragmentation (ExCID).Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Microalgal therapeutic peptides: From biomass to bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Proteomics Approaches to Ecoimmunology: New Insights into Wildlife Immunity and Disease.Integrative and comparative biology · 2025Review
- MultiStageSearch: An Iterative Workflow for Unbiased Taxonomic Analysis of Pathogens Using Proteogenomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- The microbiologist's guide to metaproteomics.iMeta · 2025Review
- Proteomics: An Essential Tool to Study Plant-Specialized Metabolism.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- NovoLign: metaproteomics by sequence alignment.ISME communications · 2024Article
- The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteome Informatics Research Group Study on Metaproteomics (iPRG-2020).Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2023Article
- Peeling back the layers of coral holobiont multi-omics data.iScience · 2023Article
- Optimizing metaproteomics database construction: lessons from a study of the vaginal microbiome.mSystems · 2023Article
- Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of peptide de novo sequencing tools for monoclonal antibody assembly.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- CIDer: A Statistical Framework for Interpreting Differences in CID and HCD Fragmentation.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- A combined microphysiological-computational omics approach in dietary protein evaluation.NPJ science of food · 2020Article
- Proteomics in Non-model Organisms: A New Analytical Frontier.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Flying blind, or just flying under the radar? The underappreciated power of de novo methods of mass spectrometric peptide identification.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The analysis of samples from unsequenced and/or understudied species as well as samples where the proteome is derived from multiple organisms poses two key questions. The first is whether the proteomic data obtained from an unusual sample type even contains peptide tandem mass spectra. The second question is whether an appropriate protein sequence database is available for proteomic searches. We describe the use of automated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.