Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31731829›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Membrane Processes for Microplastic Removal.

Teresa Poerio, Emma Piacentini, Rosalinda Mazzei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CFD Simulation of DAF processing for removal microplastic in different flotation solution.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Recognition and detection technology for microplastic, its source and health effects.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Metal-organic frameworks and plastic: an emerging synergic partnership.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Quantitative Assessment of Full Size Microplastics in Bottled and Tap Water Samples in Hong Kong.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teresa PoerioNational Research Council-Institute on Membrane Technology (ITM-CNR) c/o University of Calabria, Cubo 17C, Via Pietro BUCCI, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy.
Emma PiacentiniNational Research Council-Institute on Membrane Technology (ITM-CNR) c/o University of Calabria, Cubo 17C, Via Pietro BUCCI, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy.
Rosalinda MazzeiNational Research Council-Institute on Membrane Technology (ITM-CNR) c/o University of Calabria, Cubo 17C, Via Pietro BUCCI, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy.
National Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic pollution of the aquatic environment is a major concern considering the disastrous impact on the environment and on human beings. The significant and continuous increase in the production of plastics causes an enormous amount of plastic waste on the land entering the aquatic environment. Furthermore, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are reported as the main source of microplastic and nanoplastic in the effluents, since they are not properly designed for this purpose. The application of advanced wastewater treatment technologies is mandatory to avoid effluent contamination by plastics. A concrete solution can be represented by membrane technologies as tertiary treatment of effluents in integrated systems for wastewater treatment, in particular, for the plastic particles with a smaller size (< 100 nm). In this review, a survey of the membrane processes applied in the plastic removal is analyzed and critically discussed. From the literature analysis, it was found that the removal of microplastic by membrane technology is still insufficient, and without the use of specially designed approaches, with the exception of membrane bioreactors (MBRs).

Indexed as

Membranes, ArtificialWater PurificationHumansMicroplasticsWastewaterMembranes, ArtificialMicroplasticsWastewaterdynamic membranesmembrane bioreactorsmembrane processesmembranes recyclingmembranes reuseplastic removalreverse osmosisultrafiltrationwastewaters treatment

Identifiers

PMID31731829
PMCPMC6891368
OpenAlexW2985370024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.