Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31731813›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Equation Córdoba: A Simplified Method for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF).

Rafael Molina-Luque, Manuel Romero-Saldaña, Carlos Álvarez-Fernández, Miquel Bennasar-Veny, Álvaro Álvarez-López, Guillermo Molina-Recio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Comparison of Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) with Other Prediction Equations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Determination of cardiovascular risk in Spanish veterinarians using different scaling methods.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafael Molina-LuqueDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, Avd Menéndez Pidal No/No, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.
Manuel Romero-SaldañaDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, Córdoba City Hall, Huerto de San Pedro el Real, 1, 14003 Córdoba, Spain.
Carlos Álvarez-FernándezDepartment of Occupational Safety and Health, Córdoba City Hall, Huerto de San Pedro el Real, 1, 14003 Córdoba, Spain.
Miquel Bennasar-VenyNursing and Physiotherapy Department, Research Group on Evidence, Lifestyles & Health. Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), Universitat Illes Balears, Carretera de Valldemossa, 5, 07122 Palma, Illes Balears, Spain.
Álvaro Álvarez-LópezHospital Infanta Cristina, Extremadura Health Service, Av. de Elvas, No/No, 06080 Badajoz, Spain.
Guillermo Molina-RecioDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, Avd Menéndez Pidal No/No, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany methods for measuring body fat have been developed, but applications in clinical settings are limited. For this reason, researchers have tried to identify different formulas for its estimation but most of are hard to incorporate into daily work due to the variability in population and difficulty of use. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new equation for the simplified estimation of body fat using the Clínica Universidad de Navarra - Body Adiposity Estimator (CUN-BAE) as a reference.

methodsThis research was conducted in two phases. In the first, the new body fat estimation equation was developed. The developed equation was validated in the second phase. Pearson's linear correlation, raw and adjusted linear regressions, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman graphs were used.

resultsThe variables that best adjusted the body fat percentage were age, sex, and the Napierian logarithm of Body Mass Index (LnBMI), forming the Equation Córdoba for Estimation of Body Fat (ECORE-BF) model. In its validation, the model presented correlation values of 0.994, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.960, with the Bland-Altman graph indicating means differences of 1.82 with respect to the estimation with the CUN-BAE. Nevertheless, although the aim was to simplify the CUN-BAE, the main limitation of this study is that a gold standard, such as air displacement plethysmography (ADP) or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), was not used.

conclusionsThe proposed equation (ECORE-BF) simplified the CUN-BAE and provided a precise method, respecting the principle of parsimony, for the calculation of body fat.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdiposityAdultAge FactorsAlgorithmsAnthropometryBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSex Factorsadultsanthropometrybody fatobesity

Identifiers

PMID31731813
PMCPMC6888348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.