Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31731764›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ivan Lora-Pozo, David Lucena-Anton, Alejandro Salazar, Alejandro Galán-Mercant, Jose A Moral-Munoz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of low and high intensity interval training exercises on VOJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivan Lora-PozoDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
David Lucena-AntonDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Alejandro SalazarDepartment of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Alejandro Galán-MercantDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.
Jose A Moral-MunozDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnthropometryAdultAgedBlood PressureBody Mass IndexDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topichigh-intensity interval trainingphysical activityphysical exercisetype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31731764
PMCPMC6887993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.