Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31731733›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Hormone Receptor Expression in Multicentric/Multifocal versus Unifocal Breast Cancer: Especially the VDR Determines the Outcome Related to Focality.

Alaleh Zati Zehni, Sven-Niclas Jacob, Jan-Niclas Mumm, Helene Hildegard Heidegger, Nina Ditsch, Sven Mahner, Udo Jeschke, Theresa Vilsmaier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alaleh Zati ZehniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Sven-Niclas JacobDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, LMU, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Jan-Niclas MummDepartment of Urology, LMU Munich, University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Helene Hildegard HeideggerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Nina DitschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Udo JeschkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-3235
Theresa VilsmaierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Maistraße 11, 80337 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact that hormone receptor (HR) expressions have on the two different breast cancer (BC) entities-multifocal versus unifocal BC. As the prognosis determining aspects, we investigated the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by univariate and multivariate analysis. To underline the study's conclusions, we additionally considered the histopathological grading and the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging. A retrospective analysis was performed on survival-related events in a series of 320 breast cancer patients treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the Ludwig Maximillian University in Munich between 2000 and 2002. All three steroid receptors analyzed by immunohistochemistry, namely, the estrogen receptor (ER), the progesterone receptor (PR), and the vitamin D receptor (VDR), showed a significantly positive influence on the course of the disease, but only for the unifocal breast tumor patients. The prognosis of patients with multifocal breast cancer was either not affected by estrogen and/or progesterone receptor expression or even involved a worse etiopathology for the vitamin D receptor-positive patients. The estrogen receptor in unifocal breast cancer and the vitamin D receptor in multifocal breast cancer were especially identified as an independent prognostic marker for overall survival, when adjusted for age, grading, and staging. Altogether, our results strengthen the need to further investigate the behavior of the hormone receptors in breast cancer and understand why they have different effects on each focality type. Moreover, the studies for an adopted vitamin D supplementation due to breast cancer focality type must be enlarged to fully comprehend the remarkable and interesting role played by the vitamin D receptor.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesTriple Negative Breast Neoplasmsprogesterone receptor BReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronebreast cancerestrogen receptorhormone receptormultifocalprogesterone receptortriple negativeunifocalvitamin D receptor

Identifiers

PMID31731733
PMCPMC6888644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.