Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31730666›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Acceptability of and treatment preferences for recurrent bacterial vaginosis-Topical lactic acid gel or oral metronidazole antibiotic: Qualitative findings from the VITA trial.

Jocelyn Anstey Watkins, Jonathan D C Ross, Sukhwinder Thandi, Clare Brittain, Joe Kai, Frances Griffiths

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficacy of a Novel RigenaseMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jocelyn Anstey WatkinsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-1057
Jonathan D C RossUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom.
Sukhwinder ThandiNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom.
Clare BrittainNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom.
Joe KaiDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom.
Frances GriffithsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health HTA/15/110/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBacterial vaginosis (BV) is associated with an elevated vaginal pH and the presence of abnormal offensive discharge. It is common, often recurrent, and the most effective treatment regimen is unknown. 'Metronidazole Versus lactic acId for Treating bacterial vAginosis' (VITA) is a UK-based randomised controlled trial assessing clinical and cost-effectiveness of topical lactic acid gel compared to oral metronidazole antibiotic for treating second and subsequent BV episodes. Few BV trials report on women's preferences for treatment in the context of their own experiences.

methodThis qualitative study investigated the acceptability and tolerability of the two treatments. During the trial, semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken between January-May 2018. A total of 33 women diagnosed with BV were consecutively sampled then interviewed from six sites across England. Thematic analysis was guided by the acceptability of health interventions framework. Potential causes of BV and its impact on women's lives were explored in addition to women's treatment preference and perceived treatment effectiveness.

resultsAlthough women felt antibiotics treat BV effectively, and were associated with longer time periods between episodes, they generally preferred using the lactic acid gel because of ease of use, once daily application and less side-effects. Women would recommend the lactic acid gel to others for mild cases of BV but to take antibiotics when more severe. The risk of antibiotic drug resistance was a common concern. Self-help medicating or self-decision to not treat was also evident due to prior experience of poor outcomes from treatment. Triggers of BV were attributed to personal hygiene habits-soaps used to wash the vagina and sexual practices such as unprotected sex.

conclusionAcceptability and preference for topical lactic acid gel or oral metronidazole tablets in the treatment of recurrent BV was affected by personal choice relating to affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy. These differed depending on ease of use, tolerability and past experiences, but not necessarily based on perceived drug effectiveness. Knowledge of a patient preference for topical lactic acid gel therapy despite lower perceived effectiveness may be useful for clinicians when making treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferenceAdministration, OralAdministration, TopicalAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleGelsHumansLactic AcidMedication AdherenceMetronidazoleMiddle AgedRecurrenceVaginosis, BacterialYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsGelsLactic AcidMetronidazole

Identifiers

PMID31730666
PMCPMC6857901
OpenAlexW2989241750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.