Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31730638›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening.

Sumsum Sunny, Arun Baby, Bonney Lee James, Dev Balaji, Aparna N V, Maitreya H Rana, Praveen Gurpur, Arunan Skandarajah, Michael D'Ambrosio, Ravindra Doddathimmasandra Ramanjinappa and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Revolutionizing Oral Cancer Screening: New Approaches and Emerging Technologies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Sumsum SunnyHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Arun BabyBiomedical and Electronic (10-6-10-9) Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-5835
Bonney Lee JamesIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program (DSRG-5), Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Dev BalajiBiomedical and Electronic (10-6-10-9) Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Aparna N VBiomedical and Electronic (10-6-10-9) Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Maitreya H RanaBiomedical and Electronic (10-6-10-9) Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Praveen GurpurSiemens Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Arunan SkandarajahDepartment of Bioengineering & Biophysics Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Michael D'AmbrosioDepartment of Bioengineering & Biophysics Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Ravindra Doddathimmasandra RamanjinappaIntegrated Head and Neck Oncology Program (DSRG-5), Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Sunil Paramel MohanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial pathology, Sree Anjaneya Dental College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Nisheena RaghavanDepartment of Pathology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Uma KandasarmaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Sangeetha NDepartment of oral medicine and radiology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Subhasini RaghavanDepartment of oral medicine and radiology, KLE Society's Institute of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Naveen HedneHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Felix KochUniversity of Mainz, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel A FletcherDepartment of Bioengineering & Biophysics Program, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Sumithra SelvamDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, St. John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Manohar KollegalSiemens Healthcare Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India.
Praveen Birur NHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Lance LadicSiemens Healthineers, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Amritha SureshHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.
Hardik J PandyaBiomedical and Electronic (10-6-10-9) Engineering Systems Laboratory, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Moni Abraham KuriakoseHead and Neck Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Centre, NH Health city, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-7615

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of oral cancer necessitates a minimally invasive, tissue-specific diagnostic tool that facilitates screening/surveillance. Brush biopsy, though minimally invasive, demands skilled cyto-pathologist expertise. In this study, we explored the clinical utility/efficacy of a tele-cytology system in combination with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based risk-stratification model for early detection of oral potentially malignant (OPML)/malignant lesion. A portable, automated tablet-based tele-cytology platform capable of digitization of cytology slides was evaluated for its efficacy in the detection of OPML/malignant lesions (n = 82) in comparison with conventional cytology and histology. Then, an image pre-processing algorithm was established to segregate cells, ANN was trained with images (n = 11,981) and a risk-stratification model developed. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of platform/ stratification model were computed, and agreement was examined using Kappa statistics. The tele-cytology platform, Cellscope, showed an overall accuracy of 84-86% with no difference between tele-cytology and conventional cytology in detection of oral lesions (kappa, 0.67-0.72). However, OPML could be detected with low sensitivity (18%) in accordance with the limitations of conventional cytology. The integration of image processing and development of an ANN-based risk stratification model improved the detection sensitivity of malignant lesions (93%) and high grade OPML (73%), thereby increasing the overall accuracy by 30%. Tele-cytology integrated with the risk stratification model, a novel strategy established in this study, can be an invaluable Point-of-Care (PoC) tool for early detection/screening in oral cancer. This study hence establishes the applicability of tele-cytology for accurate, remote diagnosis and use of automated ANN-based analysis in improving its efficacy.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPoint-of-Care SystemsAlgorithmsCytodiagnosisFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31730638
PMCPMC6857853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.