ArticlePloS one2019
A smart tele-cytology point-of-care platform for oral cancer screening.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CD44-SNA1 integrated cytopathology for delineation of high grade dysplastic and neoplastic oral lesions.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Utilizing Deep Machine Learning for Prognostication of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oral health · 2021Pooled it
- A Pilot Study of the Diagnosis of Oral Cancer Through the Development of an AI Application.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Diagnostics in Primary Health Care Laboratories: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Label-free deep UV microscopy in oral cytology: a step towards stain-free diagnostics.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Breaking barriers in cancer diagnosis: unveiling the 4Ms of biosensors.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral Cancer: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Assessing the informational quality of YouTube videos.PloS one · 2025Article
- Cytopathological quantification of NORs using artificial intelligence to oral cancer screening.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Using AI in Optimizing Oral and Dental Diagnoses-A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Diagnostics in Primary Health Care Laboratories: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Advances in Portable Optical Microscopy Using Cloud Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Use of digital strategies in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a scoping review.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Oral Cancer Screening: New Approaches and Emerging Technologies.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- A Situational Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Digital Health Research Initiatives in South Asia.Cureus · 2023Review
- A Current Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Oral Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Technologies, Open Challenges, and Future Research Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Smartphone-based platforms implementing microfluidic detection with image-based artificial intelligence.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Current advances in noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a review.European journal of medical research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of oral cancer necessitates a minimally invasive, tissue-specific diagnostic tool that facilitates screening/surveillance. Brush biopsy, though minimally invasive, demands skilled cyto-pathologist expertise. In this study, we explored the clinical utility/efficacy of a tele-cytology system in combination with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based risk-stratification model for early detection of oral potentially malignant (OPML)/malignant lesion. A portable, automated tablet-based tele-cytology platform capable of digitization of cytology slides was evaluated for its efficacy in the detection of OPML/malignant lesions (n = 82) in comparison with conventional cytology and histology. Then, an image pre-processing algorithm was established to segregate cells, ANN was trained with images (n = 11,981) and a risk-stratification model developed. The specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of platform/ stratification model were computed, and agreement was examined using Kappa statistics. The tele-cytology platform, Cellscope, showed an overall accuracy of 84-86% with no difference between tele-cytology and conventional cytology in detection of oral lesions (kappa, 0.67-0.72). However, OPML could be detected with low sensitivity (18%) in accordance with the limitations of conventional cytology. The integration of image processing and development of an ANN-based risk stratification model improved the detection sensitivity of malignant lesions (93%) and high grade OPML (73%), thereby increasing the overall accuracy by 30%. Tele-cytology integrated with the risk stratification model, a novel strategy established in this study, can be an invaluable Point-of-Care (PoC) tool for early detection/screening in oral cancer. This study hence establishes the applicability of tele-cytology for accurate, remote diagnosis and use of automated ANN-based analysis in improving its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.