Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31730613›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Large-scale cortical travelling waves predict localized future cortical signals.

David M Alexander, Tonio Ball, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Cees van Leeuwen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cortical travelling waves relate to variation in personality traits.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Alpha Traveling Waves during Working Memory: Disentangling Bottom-Up Gating and Top-Down Gain Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David M AlexanderPerceptual Dynamics Laboratory, Brain and Cognition Research Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4583-8950
Tonio BallMedical Center - University of Freiburg, Translational Neurotechnology Lab, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.
Andreas Schulze-BonhageNeurozentrum der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Sektion Epileptologie, Freiburg i.Br., Germany.
Cees van LeeuwenPerceptual Dynamics Laboratory, Brain and Cognition Research Unit, KU Leuven, Leuven Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4441-2440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting future brain signal is highly sought-after, yet difficult to achieve. To predict the future phase of cortical activity at localized ECoG and MEG recording sites, we exploit its predominant, large-scale, spatiotemporal dynamics. The dynamics are extracted from the brain signal through Fourier analysis and principal components analysis (PCA) only, and cast in a data model that predicts future signal at each site and frequency of interest. The dominant eigenvectors of the PCA that map the large-scale patterns of past cortical phase to future ones take the form of smoothly propagating waves over the entire measurement array. In ECoG data from 3 subjects and MEG data from 20 subjects collected during a self-initiated motor task, mean phase prediction errors were as low as 0.5 radians at local sites, surpassing state-of-the-art methods of within-time-series or event-related models. Prediction accuracy was highest in delta to beta bands, depending on the subject, was more accurate during episodes of high global power, but was not strongly dependent on the time-course of the task. Prediction results did not require past data from the to-be-predicted site. Rather, best accuracy depended on the availability in the model of long wavelength information. The utility of large-scale, low spatial frequency traveling waves in predicting future phase activity at local sites allows estimation of the error introduced by failing to account for irreducible trajectories in the activity dynamics.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingCerebral CortexElectrocorticographyElectroencephalographyFemaleForecastingHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31730613
PMCPMC6894364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.