ReviewClinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O2019
Delaying the use of high-dose melphalan with stem cell rescue in multiple myeloma is ready for prime time.
Review in Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Busulfan and cyclophosphamide for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma after proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug treatment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CD38-Specific Gallium-68 Labeled Peptide Radiotracer Enables Pharmacodynamic Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma with PET.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- [Minimal residual disease assessment and progress in multiple myeloma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2024Article
- Acute Kidney Injury in Monoclonal Gammopathies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Cumulative exposure to melphalan chemotherapy and subsequent risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in patients with multiple myeloma.European journal of haematology · 2021Article
- Treatment of Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Melphalan in the Era of Modern Therapies-Current Research and Clinical Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Defining the undetectable: The current landscape of minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma and goals for future clarity.Blood reviews · 2021Review
- Review
- Second malignancies in multiple myeloma; emerging patterns and future directions.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2020Review
- Monitoring minimal residual disease in the bone marrow using next generation sequencing.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The significant advances made in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have allowed for a paradigm shift away from the early use of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplant (HDM-ASCT). In 2015 alone, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved 4 novel drugs for MM. Novel drugs and regimens have shown unprecedented efficacy, which has increased the tempo of new drug development. Furthermore, the FDA recently approved a diagnostic test to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) that will allow community clinicians to conduct real-time testing of MRD. Most importantly, frontline regimens based on immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) have shown a large clinical benefit. The next era has begun, as several 4-drug combinations that include monoclonal antibodies are being evaluated in clinical trials in the attempt to replace HDM-ASCT in the treatment of MM. We and others have therefore questioned the need for early HDM-ASCT, especially in light of the possible complications. HDM-ASCT is associated not only with acute toxicities-cytopenia, infection, and even death-but also an increased risk of developing secondary cancers. This article discusses the historic context of HDM-ASCT, the modern role of HDM-ASCT given the availability of highly sensitive MRD testing, and the likely future of quadruplet treatment. In summary, patients who attain deep responses using IMiD- and PI-based regimens may not require early HDM-ASCT. A delayed approach to this treatment is acceptable, and might be preferred by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31730582PMC7451402W2994123906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.