Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31730477›Full record

SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2019

Evaluation of earlier versus later dietary management in long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase or mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency: a systematic review.

Hannah Fraser, Julia Geppert, Rebecca Johnson, Samantha Johnson, Martin Connock, Aileen Clarke, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Chris Stinton

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Novel mutations in theJIMD reports · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Phospholipids: Identification and Implication in Muscle Pathophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah FraserWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. H.Fraser@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7050-9684
Julia GeppertWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Rebecca JohnsonFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, CV1 5RW, UK.
Samantha JohnsonWarwick Library, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Martin ConnockWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Aileen ClarkeWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Sian Taylor-PhillipsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Chris StintonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
University of Warwick · GBCoventry University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2016-09-018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMitochondrial trifunctional protein (MTP) and long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD) deficiencies are rare fatty acid β-oxidation disorders. Without dietary management the conditions are life-threatening. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether pre-symptomatic dietary management following newborn screening provides better outcomes than treatment following symptomatic detection.

methodsWe searched Web of Science, Medline, Pre-Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to 23rd April 2018. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility and quality appraised the studies. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by another.

resultsWe included 13 articles out of 7483 unique records. The 13 articles reported on 11 patient groups, including 174 people with LCHAD deficiency, 18 people with MTP deficiency and 12 people with undifferentiated LCHAD/MTP deficiency. Study quality was moderate to weak in all studies. Included studies suggested fewer heart and liver problems in screen-detected patients, but inconsistent results for mortality. Follow up analyses compared long-term outcomes of (1) pre-symptomatically versus symptomatically treated patients, (2) screened versus unscreened patients, and (3) asymptomatic screen-detected, symptomatic screen-detected, and clinically diagnosed patients in each study. For follow up analyses 1 and 2, we found few statistically significant differences in the long-term outcomes. For follow up analysis 3 we found a significant difference for only one comparison, in the incidence of cardiomyopathy between the three groups.

conclusionsThere is some evidence that dietary management following screen-detection might be associated with a lower incidence of some LCHAD and MTP deficiency-related complications. However, the evidence base is limited by small study sizes, quality issues and risk of confounding. An internationally collaborative research effort is needed to fully examine the risks and the benefits to pre-emptive dietary management with particular attention paid to disease severity and treatment group.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesFemaleHumansLipid Metabolism, Inborn ErrorsLong-Chain-3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA DehydrogenaseMaleMitochondrial MyopathiesMitochondrial Trifunctional ProteinNervous System DiseasesRhabdomyolysisLong-Chain-3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA DehydrogenaseMitochondrial Trifunctional ProteinInborn errors of metabolismLong-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenaseLong-term outcomesMitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiencyNewborn screeningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31730477
PMCPMC6858661
OpenAlexW2983218599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.