ArticleBMC public health2019
Psychological morbidity in Nepali cross-border migrants in India: a community based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Precarious employment and migrant workers' mental health: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2022Pooled it
- Prevalence of common mental health issues among migrant workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Depression, anxiety, suicidal risks and clinical correlates among migrant Egyptian physicians a cross-sectional study.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Association of mental health with living and working conditions among Nepali migrant workers in destination countries.Journal of migration and health · 2026Article
- Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- The burden of mental disorders in Nepal between 1990 and 2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Perceived mental health, wellbeing and associated factors among Nepali male migrant and non-migrant workers: A qualitative study.Journal of migration and health · 2021Article
- The relationship between dietary patterns and depression mediated by serum levels of Folate and vitamin B12.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince Nepali cross-border migrants can freely enter, work and stay in India, they are largely undocumented. The majority is involved in semi-skilled or unskilled jobs with limited labour rights and social security, a fact which predisposes them to psychological distress. We aimed to assess the prevalence of and factors associated with psychological morbidity among Nepali migrants upon their return from India.
methodsA community based cross-sectional study was conducted in six districts of Nepal between September 2017 and February 2018. A total of 751 participants who had worked at least six months in India and returned to Nepal were interviewed from 24 randomly selected clusters. The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 was used to measure the psychological morbidity. Data were analysed using Poisson regression analysis.
resultsThe majority was younger than 35 years (64.1%), male (96.7%), married (81.8%), had at least a primary education (66.6%), and belonged to Dalit, Janajati and religious minorities (53.7%). The prevalence of psychological morbidity was 13.5% (CI: 11.2-16.1%). Participants aged 45 years and above (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 2.74), from the Terai (aPR = 3.29), a religious minority (aPR = 3.64), who received no sick leave (aPR = 2.4), with existing health problems (aPR = 2.0) and having difficulty in accessing health care (aPR = 1.88) were more likely than others to exhibit a psychological morbidity.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that psychological morbidity was prevalent in the study participants and varied significantly with individual characteristics, work conditions and health. Multifaceted approaches including psychological counselling for returnees and protection of labour and health rights in the workplace are recommended to help reduce psychological morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.