Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31730380›Full record

Observational studyJournal of global oncology2019

Advanced Stage at Diagnosis and Worse Clinicopathologic Features in Young Women with Breast Cancer in Brazil: A Subanalysis of the AMAZONA III Study (GBECAM 0115).

Maria Alice Franzoi, Daniela D Rosa, Facundo Zaffaroni, Gustavo Werutsky, Sérgio Simon, José Bines, Carlos Barrios, Eduardo Cronemberger, Geraldo Silva Queiroz, Vladmir Cordeiro de Lima and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02663973 (Prospective Evaluation of Breast Cancer at Brazilian Institutions - Project AMAZONA III), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02663973 completednot on this map

Prospective Evaluation of Breast Cancer at Brazilian Institutions - Project AMAZONA III

TypeobservationalSponsorLatin American Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2016 to 2021Enrolled3,000ConditionsBreast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epidemiological profile of breast cancer in a reference center in the north region of Brazil.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Breast and gynecologic cancers as a Brazilian health priority.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Maria Alice FranzoiHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniela D RosaLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Facundo ZaffaroniLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Gustavo WerutskyLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Sérgio SimonLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
José BinesLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Carlos BarriosLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduardo CronembergerCentro Regional Intregado de Oncologia, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Geraldo Silva QueirozHospital Araújo Jorge, Goiás, Brazil.
Vladmir Cordeiro de LimaA.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ruffo Freitas JúniorUniversidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
José CoutoHospital do Câncer de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Karla EmerencianoLiga Norte Riograndense, Natal, Brazil.
Heloísa ResendeHospital Jardim Amalia, Volta Redonta, Brazil.
Susanne CrocamoOncoclínica Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tomás ReinertCentro de Pesquisa e Educação da Serra Gaúcha- DeVita, Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
Brigitte Van EyliInstituto do Câncer Dr Arnaldo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Yeni NerónCentro de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Vanessa DybalClínica Assistência Multidisciplinar em Oncologia, Salvador, Brazil.
Nicolas LazarettiCentro Integrado de Terapia Onco-Hematológica, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Rita de Cassia CostamillanUniversidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, Brazil.
Diocésio Alves Pinto de AndradeInstituto Oncológico de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Clarissa MathiasNúcleo Oncológico da Bahia, Lauro de Freitas, Brazil.
Giovana Zerwes VacaroHospital São Vicente de Paulo, Passo Fundo, Brazil.
Giuliano BorgesClínica de Neoplasia Litoral, Itajaí, Brazil.
Alessandra MorelleHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto Sampaio FilhoClínica Assistência Multidisciplinar em Oncologia, Salvador, Brazil.
Max ManoInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro E R LiedkeHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer (BC) in young women is uncommon and tends to present with more aggressive characteristics. To better understand and characterize this scenario in Brazil through real-world data, we performed a subanalysis of AMAZONA III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02663973).

methodsThe AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) is a prospective registry that included 2,950 women newly diagnosed with invasive BC in Brazil from January 2016 until March 2018 at 22 sites. Valid data were obtained from 2,888 patients regarding age at diagnosis and complete baseline information. To compare epidemiologic and clinicopathological features at the time of diagnosis, patients with BC were divided into two groups according to age: ≤ 40 years and > 40 years. Quantitative variables were described as means, and categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages and compared using the Pearson's χ

resultsOf 2,888 women diagnosed with BC, 486 (17%) were ≤ 40 years old. Young women had higher educational level, most were employed and a significant number were married (

conclusionBrazilian women younger than age 40 years have unfavorable clinicopathological features of BC at diagnosis, with more aggressive subtypes and advanced stage when compared with older women. These differences are not explained by socioeconomic or ethnic imbalances. The causes of a higher prevalence of BC among young women in Brazil deserve additional investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsBrazilBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID31730380
PMCPMC6882517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.