Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729995›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy or tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon with concomitant reparable rotator cuff tears.

Yuyan Na, Yong Zhu, Yuting Shi, Yizhong Ren, Ting Zhang, Wanlin Liu, Changxu Han

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Improvement in scapular dyskinesis after rotator cuff repair and subacromial decompression.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyan NaDepartment of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, The Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yong ZhuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yuting ShiCardiac Function Department, Cadre Health Care Center, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Yizhong RenDepartment of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, The Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Ting ZhangDepartment of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, The Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.
Wanlin LiuDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, the Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. 15024979153@163.com.
Changxu HanDepartment of Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine, The Second Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, No. 1 Yingfang Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, 010000, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. 671025003@qq.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University · CNInner Mongolia People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia 2016MS0366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best treatment for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) with concomitant reparable rotator cuff tears is still controversial. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes of biceps tenotomy and tenodesis for LHBT lesions.

methodsA literature retrieval was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1979 to March 2018. Comparative studies (level of evidence I or II) comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for LHBT lesions with concomitant reparable rotator cuff tears were included. Risk of bias for all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Clinical outcomes compared were Popeye sign, Constant score, VAS pain score, cramping pain, elbow flexion and forearm supination strength, and re-tear of the rotator cuff.

resultsTwo randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five prospective cohort studies (PCS) with 288 biceps tenotomy patients and 303 biceps tenodesis patients were included in this review. Tenotomy resulted in significantly greater rates of Popeye sign (RR, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.80 to 4.04]; P < 0.01) and a less favorable Constant score (MD, - 1.09 [95% CI, - 1.90 to - 0.28]; P < 0.01) compared to tenodesis. No significant heterogeneity was found between the two groups across all parameters except forearm supination strength.

conclusionsThe current evidence indicates that biceps tenodesis for LHBT lesions with concomitant reparable rotator cuff tears results in decreased rate of Popeye sign and improved Constant score compared to biceps tenotomy.

trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42018105504. Registered on 13 August 2018.

Indexed as

HumansRotator Cuff InjuriesTenodesisTenotomyBicepsMeta-analysisRotator cuffTenodesisTenotomy

Identifiers

PMID31729995
PMCPMC6858715
OpenAlexW2982755082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.