Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729831›Full record

SynthesisBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2020

Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity.

Madhav P Thakur, Helen R P Phillips, Ulrich Brose, Franciska T De Vries, Patrick Lavelle, Michel Loreau, Jerome Mathieu, Christian Mulder, Wim H Van der Putten, Matthias C Rillig and 17 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Trophic Position of the White Worm (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tetrahydroisoquinoline N-methyltransferase fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Madhav P ThakurDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-1313
Helen R P PhillipsGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Ulrich BroseGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Franciska T De VriesSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, North West England, UK.
Patrick LavelleSorbonne Université, CNRS, UPEC, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Michel LoreauCentre for Biodiversity Theory and Modelling, Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS and Paul Sabatier University, Moulis, Occitanie, France.
Jerome MathieuSorbonne Université, CNRS, UPEC, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Christian MulderDepartment Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Sicily, Italy.
Wim H Van der PuttenDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Matthias C RilligFreie Universität Berlin, Institute of Biology, Berlin, Germany.
David A WardleAsian School for the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Elizabeth M BachDepartment of Biology and School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Marie L C BartzCenter of Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Centro, Portugal.
Joanne M BennettGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Maria J I BrionesDepartamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Universidad de Vigo, Vigo, Galicien, Spain.
George BrownEmbrapa Forestry, CEP 83411-000, Colombo, PR, Brazil.
Thibaud DecaënsCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE), Montpellier, Occitanie, France.
Nico EisenhauerGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Olga FerlianGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Carlos António GuerraGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Birgitta König-RiesGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Alberto OrgiazziEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Sustainable Resources Directorate, Ispra, Varese, Italy.
Kelly S RamirezDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
David J RussellSenckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Goerlitz, Saxony, Germany.
Michiel RutgersNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diana H WallDepartment of Biology and School of Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Erin K CameronFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L02456X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil is one of the most biodiverse terrestrial habitats. Yet, we lack an integrative conceptual framework for understanding the patterns and mechanisms driving soil biodiversity. One of the underlying reasons for our poor understanding of soil biodiversity patterns relates to whether key biodiversity theories (historically developed for aboveground and aquatic organisms) are applicable to patterns of soil biodiversity. Here, we present a systematic literature review to investigate whether and how key biodiversity theories (species-energy relationship, theory of island biogeography, metacommunity theory, niche theory and neutral theory) can explain observed patterns of soil biodiversity. We then discuss two spatial compartments nested within soil at which biodiversity theories can be applied to acknowledge the scale-dependent nature of soil biodiversity.

Indexed as

BiodiversitySoilAnimalsSoil MicrobiologySoilalpha diversitybeta diversitybiodiversity theorymetacommunity theoryneutral theoryniche theoryspatial scalespecies-energy relationshiptheory of island biogeography

Identifiers

PMID31729831
PMCPMC7078968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.