ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Cerebellar-hippocampal processing in passive perception of visuospatial change: An ego- and allocentric axis?
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hippocampal subregions functional connectivity alterations in primary angle-closure glaucoma patients with cognitive dysfunction: a resting-state fMRI study.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Ageing.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- Cerebellar-hippocampal processing in passive perception of visuospatial change: An ego- and allocentric axis?Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Connectivity of the right cerebello-left hippocampal circuit across adulthood.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to its role in visuospatial navigation and the generation of spatial representations, in recent years, the hippocampus has been proposed to support perceptual processes. This is especially the case where high-resolution details, in the form of fine-grained relationships between features such as angles between components of a visual scene, are involved. An unresolved question is how, in the visual domain, perspective-changes are differentiated from allocentric changes to these perceived feature relationships, both of which may be argued to involve the hippocampus. We conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain response (corroborated through separate event-related potential source-localization) in a passive visuospatial oddball-paradigm to examine to what extent the hippocampus and other brain regions process changes in perspective, or configuration of abstract, three-dimensional structures. We observed activation of the left superior parietal cortex during perspective shifts, and right anterior hippocampus in configuration-changes. Strikingly, we also found the cerebellum to differentiate between the two, in a way that appeared tightly coupled to hippocampal processing. These results point toward a relationship between the cerebellum and the hippocampus that occurs during perception of changes in visuospatial information that has previously only been reported with regard to visuospatial navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.