ReviewLasers in medical science2020
Advances in adaptive optics-based two-photon fluorescence microscopy for brain imaging.
Review in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised deep learning enables blur-free resolution enhancement in two-photon microscopy.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Cellular multipoint adaptive technology for two-photon mesoscope.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Chemical imaging for biological systems: techniques, AI-driven processing, and applications.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2025Review
- Non-invasive 4D transcranial functional ultrasound and ultrasound localization microscopy for multimodal imaging of neurovascular response.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Analysis of Neuronal Morphology by Two-Photon Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Imagining the future of optical microscopy: everything, everywhere, all at once.Communications biology · 2023Review
- In vivo imaging with two-photon microscopy to assess the tumor-selective binding of an anti-CD137 switch antibody.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Immune cell behaviour and dynamics in the kidney - insights from in vivo imaging.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Antipsychotics With Different Chemical Structures Cause Different Degrees of Functional Impairments in the Primary Visual Cortex in a Murine Model: A Pilot Study.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Advances in nonlinear optical microscopy techniques for in vivo and in vitro neuroimaging.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Sensing Senses: Optical Biosensors to Study Gustation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep tissue imaging using two-photon fluorescence (TPF) techniques have revolutionized the optical imaging community by providing in depth molecular information at the single-cell level. These techniques provide structural and functional aspects of mammalian brain at unprecedented depth and resolution. However, wavefront distortions introduced by the optical system as well as the biological sample (tissue) limit the achievable fluorescence signal-to-noise ratio and resolution with penetration depth. In this review, we discuss on the advances in TPF microscopy techniques for in vivo functional imaging and offer guidelines as to which technologies are best suited for different imaging applications with special reference to adaptive optics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31729608What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.