Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729547›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2020

Maternal genetic diseases: potential concerns for mother and baby.

Julie Stone, Dallas Reed

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie StoneTufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Dallas ReedTufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Center, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. dreed@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8045-7515
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advances in medical care, many women with genetic conditions previously known to decrease life expectancy are reaching childbearing age. Thus, it is important to understand the management of patients in the preconception, antepartum, and postpartum periods as they pose a unique challenge to the obstetrician. Most rare disorders lack well-established clinical guidelines for management in pregnancy. Existing data stem from case reports, case series, and expert opinion. We aim to summarize these recommendations and develop a clinical reference for managing reproductive age women with these conditions. We review recommendations for women with inborn errors in metabolism, connective tissue disorders, skeletal dysplasia, and selected single gene disorders. In all cases, it is crucial to employ a multidisciplinary team to optimize care for patients with rare disease before, during, and immediately after their pregnancies. The emphasis on expert consensus recommendations in the guidance of obstetric care is a signal that more studies are needed to determine best practices.

Indexed as

FemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInfantLife ExpectancyMothersPregnancyPreimplantation DiagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID31729547
OpenAlexW2986377670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.