Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729460›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Computational redesign of the Escherichia coli ribose-binding protein ligand binding pocket for 1,3-cyclohexanediol and cyclohexanol.

Diogo Tavares, Artur Reimer, Shantanu Roy, Aurélie Joublin, Vladimir Sentchilo, Jan Roelof van der Meer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diogo TavaresDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Artur ReimerDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Shantanu RoyDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Aurélie JoublinDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Vladimir SentchiloDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan Roelof van der MeerDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. janroelof.vandermeer@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-3082
University of Lausanne · CHNovartis (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial periplasmic-binding proteins have been acclaimed as general biosensing platform, but their range of natural ligands is too limited for optimal development of chemical compound detection. Computational redesign of the ligand-binding pocket of periplasmic-binding proteins may yield variants with new properties, but, despite earlier claims, genuine changes of specificity to non-natural ligands have so far not been achieved. In order to better understand the reasons of such limited success, we revisited here the Escherichia coli RbsB ribose-binding protein, aiming to achieve perceptible transition from ribose to structurally related chemical ligands 1,3-cyclohexanediol and cyclohexanol. Combinations of mutations were computationally predicted for nine residues in the RbsB binding pocket, then synthesized and tested in an E. coli reporter chassis. Two million variants were screened in a microcolony-in-bead fluorescence-assisted sorting procedure, which yielded six mutants no longer responsive to ribose but with 1.2-1.5 times induction in presence of 1 mM 1,3-cyclohexanediol, one of which responded to cyclohexanol as well. Isothermal microcalorimetry confirmed 1,3-cyclohexanediol binding, although only two mutant proteins were sufficiently stable upon purification. Circular dichroism spectroscopy indicated discernable structural differences between these two mutant proteins and wild-type RbsB. This and further quantification of periplasmic-space abundance suggested most mutants to be prone to misfolding and/or with defects in translocation compared to wild-type. Our results thus affirm that computational design and library screening can yield RbsB mutants with recognition of non-natural but structurally similar ligands. The inherent arisal of protein instability or misfolding concomitant with designed altered ligand-binding pockets should be overcome by new experimental strategies or by improved future protein design algorithms.

Indexed as

Binding SitesDrug DesignModels, MolecularAmino AcidsCyclohexanolsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene LibraryLigandsMutationPeriplasmic Binding ProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipAmino Acidscyclohexane-1,3-diolCyclohexanolsEscherichia coli ProteinsLigandsPeriplasmic Binding ProteinsRbsB protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID31729460
PMCPMC6858440
OpenAlexW2984410768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.