Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729459›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Deep-UV excitation fluorescence microscopy for detection of lymph node metastasis using deep neural network.

Tatsuya Matsumoto, Hirohiko Niioka, Yasuaki Kumamoto, Junya Sato, Osamu Inamori, Ryuta Nakao, Yoshinori Harada, Eiichi Konishi, Eigo Otsuji, Hideo Tanaka and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deep Learning in Biomedical Optics.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya MatsumotoDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Hirohiko NiiokaInstitute for Datability Science, Osaka University, 2-8 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-2883
Yasuaki KumamotoDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4398-288X
Junya SatoFaculty of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-2036
Osamu InamoriDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Ryuta NakaoDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Yoshinori HaradaDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Eiichi KonishiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Eigo OtsujiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Hideo TanakaDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan.
Jun MiyakeGlobal Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, 1-3 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 5650871, Japan.
Tetsuro TakamatsuDepartment of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 6028566, Japan. ttakam@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-UV (DUV) excitation fluorescence microscopy has potential to provide rapid diagnosis with simple technique comparing to conventional histopathology based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. We established a fluorescent staining protocol for DUV excitation fluorescence imaging that has enabled clear discrimination of nucleoplasm, nucleolus, and cytoplasm. Fluorescence images of metastasis-positive/-negative lymph nodes of gastric cancer patients were used for patch-based training with a deep neural network (DNN) based on Inception-v3 architecture. The performance on small patches of the fluorescence images was comparable with that of H&E images. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping analysis revealed the areas where the trained model identified metastatic lesions in the images containing cancer cells. We extended the method to large-size image analysis enabling accurate detection of metastatic lesions. We discuss usefulness of DUV excitation fluorescence imaging with the aid of DNN analysis, which is promising for assisting pathologists in assessment of lymph node metastasis.

Indexed as

Microscopy, FluorescenceNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBiopsyFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningSoftware

Identifiers

PMID31729459
PMCPMC6858352
OpenAlexW2986093791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.