Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729446›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

RBV: Read balance validator, a tool for prioritising copy number variations in germline conditions.

Whitney Whitford, Klaus Lehnert, Russell G Snell, Jessie C Jacobsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Whitney WhitfordSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. whitney.whitford@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-1502
Klaus LehnertSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Russell G SnellSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jessie C JacobsenSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularisation and decreased cost of genome resequencing has resulted in an increased use in molecular diagnostics. While there are a number of established and high quality bioinfomatic tools for identifying small genetic variants including single nucleotide variants and indels, currently there is no established standard for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from sequence data. The requirement for CNV detection from high throughput sequencing has resulted in the development of a large number of software packages. These tools typically utilise the sequence data characteristics: read depth, split reads, read pairs, and assembly-based techniques. However, the additional source of information from read balance (defined as relative proportion of reads of each allele at each position) has been underutilised in the existing applications. Here we present Read Balance Validator (RBV), a bioinformatic tool that uses read balance for prioritisation and validation of putative CNVs. The software simultaneously interrogates nominated regions for the presence of deletions or multiplications, and can differentiate larger CNVs from diploid regions. Additionally, the utility of RBV to test for inheritance of CNVs is demonstrated in this report. RBV is a CNV validation and prioritisation bioinformatic tool for both genome and exome sequencing available as a python package from https://github.com/whitneywhitford/RBV.

Identifiers

PMID31729446
PMCPMC6858463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.