ArticleScientific reports2019
RBV: Read balance validator, a tool for prioritising copy number variations in germline conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The popularisation and decreased cost of genome resequencing has resulted in an increased use in molecular diagnostics. While there are a number of established and high quality bioinfomatic tools for identifying small genetic variants including single nucleotide variants and indels, currently there is no established standard for the detection of copy number variants (CNVs) from sequence data. The requirement for CNV detection from high throughput sequencing has resulted in the development of a large number of software packages. These tools typically utilise the sequence data characteristics: read depth, split reads, read pairs, and assembly-based techniques. However, the additional source of information from read balance (defined as relative proportion of reads of each allele at each position) has been underutilised in the existing applications. Here we present Read Balance Validator (RBV), a bioinformatic tool that uses read balance for prioritisation and validation of putative CNVs. The software simultaneously interrogates nominated regions for the presence of deletions or multiplications, and can differentiate larger CNVs from diploid regions. Additionally, the utility of RBV to test for inheritance of CNVs is demonstrated in this report. RBV is a CNV validation and prioritisation bioinformatic tool for both genome and exome sequencing available as a python package from https://github.com/whitneywhitford/RBV.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.