Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Somatic mutation profiling and HER2 status in KRAS-positive Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

Zhouhuan Dong, Linghong Kong, Zhiyi Wan, Fengwei Zhu, Mei Zhong, Yali Lv, Po Zhao, Huaiyin Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adagrasib in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeting KRAS in Colorectal Cancer: A Bench to Bedside Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhouhuan DongChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China.
Linghong KongChuiYangLiu Hospital affiliated to Tsinghua University, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100022, China.
Zhiyi WanChuiYangLiu Hospital affiliated to Tsinghua University, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100022, China.
Fengwei ZhuChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China.
Mei ZhongChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yali LvChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China.
Po ZhaoChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China.
Huaiyin ShiChinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Pathology, Beijing, 100853, China. shihuaiyin@sina.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNBeijing Chuiyangliu Hospital · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KRAS is an independent negative predictor for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) treatment in colorectal cancers (CRCs). However, 30% to 50% of CRC patients are KRAS-positive and do not benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. In this study, we investigated the mutational features and clinical significance of KRAS-positive Chinese CRC patients. A total of 139 Chinese CRC patients who received clinical KRAS testing (Sanger sequencing) were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Fifty KRAS-positive specimens were further detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The most prevalent mutation in KRAS was G12D (46%), followed by G12V (20%), and G13D (18%). In addition to KRAS, 72 unique alterations in another 12 genes were also detected. The most common mutated genes were TP53 (62%), APC (46%), and PIK3CA (22%). The proportion of HER2 amplifications in KRAS-positive CRC patients was 4.4%, which was lower than that in KRAS -negative CRC patients (14.3%). No relationship was found between HER2 amplification and KRAS status (p = 0.052). However, the odds ratio is very low (0.279). In addition, these gene mutations were not significantly associated with age, sex, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, mismatch repair-deficient, or tumor differentiation. However, TP53 mutations were more prevalent in colon cancer with KRAS mutations than in rectal cancer (75.0% vs 28.6%, respectively, p = 0.004). The negative predictive value of the IHC analysis for predicting HER2 amplification reached to 98.39%, while the positive predictive value reached only 50%. Overall, the mutation profiling of Chinese CRC patients with KRAS mutations is different from that of Western CRC patients. Our results will help us to understand the molecular features of Chinese CRC patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmino Acid SubstitutionAsian PeopleChinaCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationGene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID31729406
PMCPMC6858340
OpenAlexW2988655122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.