Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31729169›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2020

Predicting In Vivo Efficacy from In Vitro Data: Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling for an Epigenetic Modifier Drug in Cancer.

Mehdi Bouhaddou, Li J Yu, Serena Lunardi, Spyros K Stamatelos, Fiona Mack, James M Gallo, Marc R Birtwistle, Antje-Christine Walz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Growth-rate model predicts in vivo tumor response from in vitro data.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mehdi BouhaddouRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9526-1427
Li J YuRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, New York, New York, USA.
Serena LunardiOryzon Genomics S.A., Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain.
Spyros K StamatelosRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, New York, New York, USA.
Fiona MackRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Oncology, Roche Innovation Center, New York, New York, USA.
James M GalloPharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-4817
Marc R BirtwistlePharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0341-0705
Antje-Christine WalzRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2177-545X

Funding

Predicting the Heterogeneity of Cell-Fate DecisionsR01GM104184 · NIGMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BIRTWISTLE, MARC R. · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliably predicting in vivo efficacy from in vitro data would facilitate drug development by reducing animal usage and guiding drug dosing in human clinical trials. However, such prediction remains challenging. Here, we built a quantitative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) mathematical model capable of predicting in vivo efficacy in animal xenograft models of tumor growth while trained almost exclusively on in vitro cell culture data sets. We studied a chemical inhibitor of LSD1 (ORY-1001), a lysine-specific histone demethylase enzyme with epigenetic function, and drug-induced regulation of target engagement, biomarker levels, and tumor cell growth across multiple doses administered in a pulsed and continuous fashion. A PK model of unbound plasma drug concentration was linked to the in vitro PD model, which enabled the prediction of in vivo tumor growth dynamics across a range of drug doses and regimens. Remarkably, only a change in a single parameter-the one controlling intrinsic cell/tumor growth in the absence of drug-was needed to scale the PD model from the in vitro to in vivo setting. These findings create a framework for using in vitro data to predict in vivo drug efficacy with clear benefits to reducing animal usage while enabling the collection of dense time course and dose response data in a highly controlled in vitro environment.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDatasets as TopicDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistone DemethylasesHumansMiceNeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsHistone DemethylasesKDM1A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31729169
PMCPMC7070804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.