Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728898›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2019

WormBot, an open-source robotics platform for survival and behavior analysis in C. elegans.

Jason N Pitt, Nolan L Strait, Elena M Vayndorf, Benjamin W Blue, Christina H Tran, Brendon E M Davis, Karen Huang, Brock J Johnson, Keong Mu Lim, Sophie Liu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Automating the practice of science: Opportunities, challenges, and implications.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Analysis of aComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  20. Automation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jason N PittDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Nolan L StraitDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Elena M VayndorfDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Benjamin W BlueDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Christina H TranDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Brendon E M DavisDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Karen HuangDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Brock J JohnsonDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Keong Mu LimDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Sophie LiuDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Arash NikjooDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Anuj VaidDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Judy Z WuDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Matt KaeberleinDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. kaeber@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1311-3421

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PRUSKY, GLEN THOMAS · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Maitreya J Dunham · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
GENETIC APPROACHES TO AGING RESEARCHT32AG000057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2019
$14.2M
National Institute on Aging (US) T32AG000057NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280NIA NIH HHS P30AG013280NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans is a popular organism for aging research owing to its highly conserved molecular pathways, short lifespan, small size, and extensive genetic and reverse genetic resources. Here we describe the WormBot, an open-source robotic image capture platform capable of conducting 144 parallel C. elegans survival and behavioral phenotyping experiments. The WormBot uses standard 12-well tissue culture plates suitable for solid agar media and is built from commercially available robotics hardware. The WormBot is controlled by a web-based interface allowing control and monitoring of experiments from any internet connected device. The standard WormBot hardware features the ability to take both time-lapse bright field images and real-time video micrographs, allowing investigators to measure lifespan, as well as heathspan metrics as worms age. The open-source nature of the hardware and software will allow for users to extend the platform and implement new software and hardware features. This extensibility, coupled with the low cost and simplicity of the system, allows the automation of C. elegans survival analysis even in small laboratory settings with modest budgets.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsAutomationCaenorhabditis elegansLongevityModels, AnimalRoboticsAutomatedC. elegansHealthspanOpen-sourceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID31728898
PMCPMC6925079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.