ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
A novel suction-based lung-stabilizing device in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical procedures.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety, efficacy, and postoperative pulmonary function recovery of uniportal and multiportal thoracoscopic lung segmentectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSingle-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SPVATS) has become a subject of interest for thoracic surgeons in recent years; however, it has not been fully accepted partly because the procedure is technically demanding. We speculate that the most critical problem of SPVATS is that significant interferences of the instruments may occur during the procedure because all the instruments share only a single incisional port. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usability of a new suction-based lung-stabilizing device during SPVATS procedure.
methodsWe developed a novel suction-based lung-stabilizing device equipped with three hemispheric silicon suction cups. Ten cases of canine's lower lobectomies were performed. Five cases were performed without this device and designated as the control cases. The remaining cases were performed using this device and were designated as the experimental cases.
resultsA significantly fewer number of interruption times were noted in the novel lung-stabilizing device group than in the control group (average, 0.4 vs. 4.4; P = 0.0031). Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, the device tended to demonstrate better performance compared with the control group regarding the operation time, organ damage, and accomplishment of SPVATS.
conclusionOur study indicates that the novel lung-stabilizing device has potentially useful applications in SPVATS procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31728836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.