Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31728795›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2019

Zoonotic Pathogen Seroprevalence in Cattle in a Wildlife-Livestock Interface, Kenya.

Daniel Nthiwa, Silvia Alonso, David Odongo, Eucharia Kenya, Bernard Bett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Detection and Determinants ofPublic health challenges · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Seroprevalence ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel NthiwaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, P.O BOX 6, Embu, 60100, Kenya. danielmutiso8@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-4164
Silvia AlonsoInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O BOX 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
David OdongoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O BOX 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Eucharia KenyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Embu, P.O BOX 6, Embu, 60100, Kenya.
Bernard BettInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O BOX 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) led by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) CRP21-0A3-2017German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD) provided additional funding through a scholarship programme, 'Special initiative, a world without hunger, 2015' 57221138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of Brucella spp. and Leptospira spp. and risk factors of exposure in cattle in three zones with varying land use types and wildlife-livestock interactions. Five villages were selected purposively; two in areas with intensive livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 1), another two in areas with moderate livestock-wildlife interactions (zone 2) and one in areas where wildlife-livestock interactions are rarer (zone 3). Sera samples were collected from 1170 cattle belonging to 390 herds in all the zones and tested for antibodies against Brucella abortus and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo using ELISA kits. Data on putative risk factors for seropositivity of these pathogens in cattle were collected using a questionnaire. The overall apparent animal-level seroprevalence of brucellosis and leptospirosis was, respectively, 36.9% (95% CI 34.1-39.8) and 23.5% (95% CI 21.1-26.0). Brucella spp. seroprevalence was higher in zone 1 than in zones 2 and 3 (χ

Indexed as

Seroepidemiologic StudiesAnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaBrucellosisCattleCross-Sectional StudiesKenyaLeptospiraLeptospirosisLivestockRisk FactorsZoonosesAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaLand use changeLeptospiraSeroprevalenceWildlife–livestock interface

Identifiers

PMID31728795
PMCPMC6910896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.